University Medical Center Utrecht , Department of Orthopaedics , Utrecht.
Acta Orthop. 2015 Feb;86(1):114-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.950467. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) is a disease-modifying drug for treatment of knee osteoarthritis, and modest superiority over placebo was reported in an earlier randomized controlled trial (RCT). We hypothesized that when given the opportunity, placebo-treated patients from that RCT would now opt for ACS treatment, which would result in a greater clinical improvement than placebo.
Of 74 patients treated with placebo in the previous trial, 20 opted for ACS treatment. Patients who did not choose further treatment were interviewed about their reasons. Clinical improvement of the 20 ACS-treated patients was measured using knee-specific clinical scores, as was "response shift" at 3 and 12 months.
In the 20 patients who did opt for ACS, the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain improved; but after 12 months, clinical results were similar to those after placebo treatment. Response shift measurement demonstrated that the 20 patients had adapted to their disabilities during treatment.
Placebo-treated patients from an earlier trial were reluctant to undergo ACS treatment, in part due to the laborious nature of the therapy. In a subset of patients who opted for treatment, ACS treatment after placebo did not result in greater clinical improvement than placebo treatment only. However, due to the limited power of the current study and possible selection bias, definite advice on using or refraining from ACS cannot be given.
自体条件血清(ACS)是一种治疗膝骨关节炎的疾病修正药物,在早期的随机对照试验(RCT)中报告其优于安慰剂。我们假设,在前一项 RCT 中接受安慰剂治疗的 74 名患者中,现在会有更多的患者选择 ACS 治疗,如果有机会的话,他们会选择 ACS 治疗,这将比安慰剂治疗带来更大的临床改善。
在前一项试验中接受安慰剂治疗的 74 名患者中,有 20 名选择了 ACS 治疗。未选择进一步治疗的患者接受了关于其原因的访谈。对 20 名接受 ACS 治疗的患者的临床改善情况进行了膝关节特定临床评分的测量,同时在 3 个月和 12 个月时进行了“反应转移”的测量。
在选择 ACS 治疗的 20 名患者中,疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)有所改善;但 12 个月后,临床结果与安慰剂治疗相似。反应转移测量表明,这 20 名患者在治疗过程中已经适应了他们的残疾。
早期试验中的安慰剂治疗患者不愿意接受 ACS 治疗,部分原因是治疗的复杂性。在选择治疗的患者亚组中,ACS 治疗后与安慰剂治疗相比,并未带来更大的临床改善。然而,由于当前研究的效力有限和可能存在选择偏倚,不能确定是否使用或避免使用 ACS。