Suppr超能文献

弗朗茨·约瑟夫·加尔的《器官学》中的性与性别问题:一种初步探讨

Matters of sex and gender in F. J. Gall's Organology: a primary approach.

作者信息

Cornel Tabea

机构信息

a Department of History and Sociology of Science , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA.

出版信息

J Hist Neurosci. 2014;23(4):377-94. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2014.885097. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

Abstract

The originator of phrenology, F. J. Gall (1758-1828), saw himself as a natural scientist and physiologist. His approach consisted of brain anatomy but also of palpating skulls and inferring mental faculties. Unlike some of the philosophical principles underlying Gall's work, his conception of sex/gender has not yet been examined in detail. In this article, I will focus on Gall's treatment of men and women, his idea of sex differences, and how far an assumed existence of dichotomous sexes influenced his work. In examining his primary writings, I will argue that Gall held some contradictory views concerning the origin and manifestation of sex/gender characteristics, which were caused by the collision of his naturalistic ideas and internalized gender stereotypes. I will conclude that Gall did not aim at deducing or legitimizing sex/gender relations scientifically, but that he tried to express metaphysical reasons for a given social order in terms of functional brain mechanisms.

摘要

颅相学的创始人弗朗茨·约瑟夫·加尔(1758 - 1828)视自己为一名自然科学家和生理学家。他的研究方法包括大脑解剖,也包括触摸头骨并推断心理官能。与加尔著作所依据的一些哲学原理不同,他关于性/性别的概念尚未得到详细研究。在本文中,我将聚焦于加尔对男性和女性的论述、他的性别差异观念,以及二元性别的假定存在在多大程度上影响了他的工作。在审视他的主要著作时,我将论证加尔在性/性别特征的起源和表现方面持有一些相互矛盾的观点,这些观点是由他的自然主义思想与内化的性别刻板印象的碰撞所导致的。我将得出结论,加尔并非旨在科学地推导或使性/性别关系合法化,而是试图从功能性大脑机制的角度来表达特定社会秩序的形而上学原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验