Suppr超能文献

商业与运营连续性:大流行和灾难期间危重症及受伤患者的护理:CHEST共识声明

Business and continuity of operations: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.

作者信息

Tosh Pritish K, Feldman Henry, Christian Michael D, Devereaux Asha V, Kissoon Niranjan, Dichter Jeffrey R

出版信息

Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e103S-17S. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0739.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During disasters, supply chain vulnerabilities, such as power, transportation, and communication, may affect the delivery of medications and medical supplies and hamper the ability to deliver critical care services. Disasters also have the potential to disrupt information technology (IT) in health-care systems, resulting in interruptions in patient care, particularly critical care, and other health-care business functions. The suggestions in this article are important for all of those involved in a large-scale pandemic or disaster with multiple critically ill or injured patients, including front-line clinicians, hospital administrators, and public health or government officials.

METHODS

The Business and Continuity of Operations Panel followed the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guidelines Oversight Committee's methodology in developing key questions regarding medication and supply shortages and the impact disasters may have on healthcare IT. Task force members met in person to develop the 13 key questions believed to be most relevant for Business and Continuity of Operations. A systematic literature review was then performed for relevant articles and documents, reports, and gray literature reported since 2007. No studies of sufficient quality were identified upon which to make evidence-based recommendations. Therefore, the panel developed expert opinion-based suggestions using a modified Delphi process.

RESULTS

Eighteen suggestions addressing mitigation strategies for supply chain vulnerabilities including medications and IT were generated. Suggestions offered to hospitals and health system leadership regarding medication and supply shortages include: (1) purchase key medications and supplies from more than one supplier, (2) substituted medications or supplies should ideally be similar to those already used by an institution's providers, (3) inventories should be tracked electronically to monitor medication/supply levels, (4) consider higher inventories of medications and supplies known or projected to be in short supply, (5) institute alternate use protocols when a (potential) shortage is identified, and 6) support government and nongovernmental organizations in efforts to address supply chain vulnerability. Health-care IT can be damaged in a disaster, and hospitals and health system leadership should have plans for urgently reestablishing local area networks. Planning should include using portable technology, plans for providing power, maintenance of a patient database that can accompany each patient, and protection of patient privacy. Additionally, long-term planning should include prioritizing servers and memory disk drives and possibly increasing inventory of critical IT supplies in preparedness planning.

CONCLUSIONS

The provision of care to the critically ill or injured during a pandemic or disaster is dependent on key processes, such as the supply chain, and infrastructure, such as IT systems. Hospitals and health systems will help minimize the impact of medication and supply shortages with a focused strategy using the steps suggested. IT preparedness for maintaining local area networks, functioning clinical information systems, and adequate server and memory storage capacity will greatly enhance preparedness for hospital and health system clinical and business operations.

摘要

背景

在灾难期间,供应链的脆弱性,如电力、运输和通信方面,可能会影响药品和医疗用品的交付,并阻碍提供重症护理服务的能力。灾难还可能扰乱医疗保健系统中的信息技术(IT),导致患者护理(尤其是重症护理)以及其他医疗保健业务功能的中断。本文中的建议对于所有参与应对有多名重症或受伤患者的大规模疫情或灾难的人员都很重要,包括一线临床医生、医院管理人员以及公共卫生或政府官员。

方法

运营业务与连续性小组遵循美国胸科医师学会(CHEST)指南监督委员会的方法,制定了关于药品和物资短缺以及灾难可能对医疗保健IT产生的影响的关键问题。特别工作组成员亲自会面,制定了13个被认为与运营业务与连续性最相关的关键问题。然后对自2007年以来报告的相关文章、文件、报告和灰色文献进行了系统的文献综述。未发现有足够质量的研究可作为循证建议的依据。因此,该小组采用改良的德尔菲法制定了基于专家意见的建议。

结果

针对包括药品和IT在内的供应链脆弱性的缓解策略提出了18条建议。就药品和物资短缺向医院及卫生系统领导层提供的建议包括:(1)从多个供应商购买关键药品和物资;(2)替代药品或物资理想情况下应与机构提供者已使用的类似;(3)应通过电子方式跟踪库存以监测药品/物资水平;(4)考虑增加已知或预计短缺的药品和物资的库存;(5)在确定(潜在)短缺时制定替代使用方案;以及(6)支持政府和非政府组织应对供应链脆弱性的努力。医疗保健IT在灾难中可能受损,医院及卫生系统领导层应制定紧急重建局域网的计划。规划应包括使用便携式技术、供电计划、维护可随每位患者携带的患者数据库以及保护患者隐私。此外,长期规划应包括对服务器和内存磁盘驱动器进行优先级排序,并可能在备灾规划中增加关键IT物资的库存。

结论

在疫情或灾难期间为重症或受伤患者提供护理取决于关键流程,如供应链,以及基础设施,如IT系统。医院和卫生系统通过采用建议的步骤实施重点策略,将有助于最大限度地减少药品和物资短缺的影响。为维护局域网、正常运行的临床信息系统以及充足的服务器和内存存储容量做好IT准备,将大大增强医院和卫生系统临床及业务运营的准备能力。

相似文献

7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

引用本文的文献

2
Lessons Learned from Natural Disasters around Digital Health Technologies and Delivering Quality Healthcare.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;20(5):4542. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054542.
3
Reducing patient surge: community based social networks as first responders.
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2021;108(1):163-175. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04674-0. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
Elements of an Effective Incident Command Center.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Sep;95(9S):S3-S7. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Design for Implementation of a System-Level ICU Pandemic Surge Staffing Plan.
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Jun 15;2(6):e0136. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000136. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
A Productive Proposed Search Syntax for Health Disaster Preparedness Research.
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Apr;7(2):93-98. doi: 10.29252/beat-070201..
8
Premature Death of a Schizophrenic Patient due to Evacuation after a Nuclear Disaster in Fukushima.
Case Rep Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 7;2019:3284153. doi: 10.1155/2019/3284153. eCollection 2019.
9
Always ready, always prepared-preparing for the next pandemic.
Transl Pediatr. 2018 Oct;7(4):344-355. doi: 10.21037/tp.2018.09.06.

本文引用的文献

7
Critical resources for hospital surge capacity: an expert consensus panel.
PLoS Curr. 2013 Oct 7;5:ecurrents.dis.67c1afe8d78ac2ab0ea52319eb119688. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.67c1afe8d78ac2ab0ea52319eb119688.
8
Secure scalable disaster electronic medical record and tracking system.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Oct;28(5):498-501. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13008686. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
9
Using a cloud-based electronic health record during disaster response: a case study in Fukushima, March 2011.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Aug;28(4):383-7. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1300037X. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
10
In search of the silver lining: the impact of Superstorm Sandy on Bellevue Hospital.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Apr;10(2):135-42. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201212-116OT.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验