Suppr超能文献

用于癫痫发作的迷走神经刺激磁激活:一项批判性综述。

Vagus nerve stimulation magnet activation for seizures: a critical review.

作者信息

Fisher R S, Eggleston K S, Wright C W

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2015 Jan;131(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/ane.12288. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

Abstract

Some patients receiving VNS Therapy report benefit from manually activating the generator with a handheld magnet at the time of a seizure. A review of 20 studies comprising 859 subjects identified patients who reported on-demand magnet mode stimulation to be beneficial. Benefit was reported in a weighted average of 45% of patients (range 0-89%) using the magnet, with seizure cessation claimed in a weighted average of 28% (range 15-67%). In addition to seizure termination, patients sometimes reported decreased intensity or duration of seizures or the post-ictal period. One study reported an isolated instance of worsening with magnet stimulation (Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 157, 2003 and 560). All of the reviewed studies assessed adjunctive magnet use. No studies were designed to provide Level I evidence of efficacy of magnet-induced stimulation. Retrospective analysis of one pivotal randomized trial of VNS therapy showed significantly more seizures terminated or improved in the active stimulation group vs the control group. Prospective, controlled studies would be required to isolate the effect and benefit of magnet mode stimulation and to document that the magnet-induced stimulation is the proximate cause of seizure reduction. Manual application of the magnet to initiate stimulation is not always practical because many patients are immobilized or unaware of their seizures, asleep or not in reach of the magnet. Algorithms based on changes in heart rate at or near the onset of the seizure provide a methodology for automated responsive stimulation. Because literature indicates additional benefits from on-demand magnet mode stimulation, a potential role exists for automatic activation of stimulation.

摘要

一些接受迷走神经刺激疗法(VNS Therapy)的患者报告称,在癫痫发作时用手持磁铁手动激活发生器有益。一项对包含859名受试者的20项研究的综述确定了那些报告按需磁铁模式刺激有益的患者。使用磁铁的患者加权平均受益率为45%(范围为0 - 89%),癫痫发作停止的加权平均声称率为28%(范围为15 - 67%)。除了癫痫发作终止外,患者有时还报告癫痫发作或发作后期的强度或持续时间有所降低。一项研究报告了一例磁铁刺激导致病情恶化的孤立病例(《儿科学与青少年医学档案》,157卷,2003年,第560页)。所有综述的研究都评估了辅助磁铁的使用。没有研究旨在提供磁铁诱发刺激疗效的一级证据。对一项VNS疗法关键随机试验的回顾性分析表明,与对照组相比,主动刺激组癫痫发作终止或改善的情况明显更多。需要进行前瞻性对照研究,以分离磁铁模式刺激的效果和益处,并证明磁铁诱发刺激是癫痫发作减少的直接原因。手动应用磁铁启动刺激并不总是可行的,因为许多患者在癫痫发作时无法活动或未意识到发作,处于睡眠状态或无法拿到磁铁。基于癫痫发作开始时或接近开始时心率变化的算法提供了一种自动响应刺激的方法。由于文献表明按需磁铁模式刺激有额外益处,因此自动激活刺激存在潜在作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验