Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Oct;59(10):2503-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3327-8. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is indicated to evaluate for suspected small bowel bleeding, but "standard view" (SV) evaluation is time-consuming. Rapid Reader 6.0 software (Given Imaging, Duluth GA) contains two computer algorithmic systems: (1) "Quickview" (QV) which automatically skips similar images and (2) a pixel analysis program that identifies suspected blood (SBI). Combining the two modalities (QV + SBI) may provide a faster modality to assess for active small bowel bleeding.
This study was designed to assess the accuracy of QV + SBI for small bowel bleeding compared to SV findings.
This is a retrospective, case-control study at a single tertiary care referral hospital including all patients with VCE performed for suspected small bowel bleeding from 4/2007 to 3/2011. All studies were previously read using SV by one of two experienced faculty (CS, DR). The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of QV + SBI in assessing for active small bowel bleeding compared to SV.
A total of 116 VCE were included, 28 with active small bowel bleeding identified by original SV. Using QV + SBI, all 28 VCEs with active small bowel bleeding were identified. The sensitivity of QV + SBI to detect active bleeding was 100%, while the specificity was 93-94%. The mean time to identify landmarks and read the entire study was 3 min 20 s.
The QV + SBI reading format of VCE is an efficient, highly sensitive modality to assess for potential small bowel bleeding.
视频胶囊内镜(VCE)适用于疑似小肠出血的评估,但“标准视图”(SV)评估耗时。Given Imaging 公司的 Rapid Reader 6.0 软件包含两种计算机算法系统:(1)“快速查看”(QV),它自动跳过相似的图像,(2)一种识别可疑血液的像素分析程序(SBI)。将这两种模式(QV+SBI)结合起来,可以提供一种更快的方法来评估小肠的活动性出血。
本研究旨在评估 QV+SBI 对小肠出血的评估准确性与 SV 结果相比。
这是一项在一家三级转诊医院进行的回顾性病例对照研究,包括 2007 年 4 月至 2011 年 3 月期间所有因疑似小肠出血而行 VCE 的患者。所有研究均由两位经验丰富的教员(CS、DR)使用 SV 进行了预先阅读。主要结果是 QV+SBI 在评估活动性小肠出血方面的诊断准确性与 SV 相比。
共纳入 116 例 VCE,28 例经原始 SV 诊断为活动性小肠出血。使用 QV+SBI,所有 28 例活动性小肠出血的 VCE 均被识别出来。QV+SBI 检测活动性出血的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 93-94%。识别标志和阅读整个研究的平均时间为 3 分 20 秒。
VCE 的 QV+SBI 阅读格式是一种评估潜在小肠出血的高效、高敏感的方法。