Suppr超能文献

一种快速准确的方法,用于检测视频胶囊内镜下的活动性小肠胃肠道出血。

A rapid and accurate method to detect active small bowel gastrointestinal bleeding on video capsule endoscopy.

机构信息

Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 4076, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Oct;59(10):2503-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3327-8. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is indicated to evaluate for suspected small bowel bleeding, but "standard view" (SV) evaluation is time-consuming. Rapid Reader 6.0 software (Given Imaging, Duluth GA) contains two computer algorithmic systems: (1) "Quickview" (QV) which automatically skips similar images and (2) a pixel analysis program that identifies suspected blood (SBI). Combining the two modalities (QV + SBI) may provide a faster modality to assess for active small bowel bleeding.

AIMS

This study was designed to assess the accuracy of QV + SBI for small bowel bleeding compared to SV findings.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, case-control study at a single tertiary care referral hospital including all patients with VCE performed for suspected small bowel bleeding from 4/2007 to 3/2011. All studies were previously read using SV by one of two experienced faculty (CS, DR). The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of QV + SBI in assessing for active small bowel bleeding compared to SV.

RESULTS

A total of 116 VCE were included, 28 with active small bowel bleeding identified by original SV. Using QV + SBI, all 28 VCEs with active small bowel bleeding were identified. The sensitivity of QV + SBI to detect active bleeding was 100%, while the specificity was 93-94%. The mean time to identify landmarks and read the entire study was 3 min 20 s.

CONCLUSIONS

The QV + SBI reading format of VCE is an efficient, highly sensitive modality to assess for potential small bowel bleeding.

摘要

背景

视频胶囊内镜(VCE)适用于疑似小肠出血的评估,但“标准视图”(SV)评估耗时。Given Imaging 公司的 Rapid Reader 6.0 软件包含两种计算机算法系统:(1)“快速查看”(QV),它自动跳过相似的图像,(2)一种识别可疑血液的像素分析程序(SBI)。将这两种模式(QV+SBI)结合起来,可以提供一种更快的方法来评估小肠的活动性出血。

目的

本研究旨在评估 QV+SBI 对小肠出血的评估准确性与 SV 结果相比。

方法

这是一项在一家三级转诊医院进行的回顾性病例对照研究,包括 2007 年 4 月至 2011 年 3 月期间所有因疑似小肠出血而行 VCE 的患者。所有研究均由两位经验丰富的教员(CS、DR)使用 SV 进行了预先阅读。主要结果是 QV+SBI 在评估活动性小肠出血方面的诊断准确性与 SV 相比。

结果

共纳入 116 例 VCE,28 例经原始 SV 诊断为活动性小肠出血。使用 QV+SBI,所有 28 例活动性小肠出血的 VCE 均被识别出来。QV+SBI 检测活动性出血的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 93-94%。识别标志和阅读整个研究的平均时间为 3 分 20 秒。

结论

VCE 的 QV+SBI 阅读格式是一种评估潜在小肠出血的高效、高敏感的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验