Kielmann Karina, Datye Vinita, Pradhan Anagha, Rangan Sheela
a Institute for International Health & Development , Queen Margaret University , Edinburgh , Scotland.
Glob Public Health. 2014;9(8):975-92. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.941898. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
While concepts such as 'partnership' are central to the terminology of private-public mix (PPM), little attention has been paid to how social relations are negotiated among the diverse actors responsible for implementing these inter-sectoral arrangements. India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) has used intermediary agents to facilitate the involvement of private providers in the expansion of Directly Observed Therapy, Short-Course (DOTS). We examine the roles of tuberculosis health visitors (TB HVs) in mediating working relationships among private providers, programme staff and patients that underpin a PPM-DOTS launched by the RNTCP in western Maharashtra. In addition to observations and informal interactions with the programme and participating health providers, researchers conducted in-depth interviews with senior programme officers and eight TB HVs. Framed by a political discourse of clinical governance, working relationships within the PPM are structured by the pluralistic context, social and professional hierarchies and paternalism of health care in India. TB HVs are at the nexus of these relationships, yet remain undervalued partly because accountability is measured through technical rather than social outcomes of the 'partnership'. Close attention to the dynamics of power relations in working practices within the health system can improve accountability and sustainability of partnerships.
虽然“伙伴关系”等概念是公私合作(PPM)术语的核心,但对于负责实施这些跨部门安排的不同行为者之间如何协商社会关系,却很少有人关注。印度修订后的国家结核病控制规划(RNTCP)利用中介机构来促进私立医疗服务提供者参与扩大直接观察短程治疗(DOTS)。我们研究了结核病健康访视员(TB HVs)在调解私立医疗服务提供者、规划工作人员和患者之间工作关系中的作用,这些关系构成了RNTCP在马哈拉施特拉邦西部发起的公私合作 - DOTS的基础。除了对该规划和参与的医疗服务提供者进行观察和非正式互动外,研究人员还对高级规划官员和八位结核病健康访视员进行了深入访谈。在临床治理的政治话语框架下,公私合作中的工作关系由印度医疗保健的多元背景、社会和专业等级制度以及家长式作风所构建。结核病健康访视员处于这些关系的核心,但部分原因是通过“伙伴关系”的技术而非社会成果来衡量问责制,他们仍然被低估。密切关注卫生系统内工作实践中的权力关系动态,可以提高伙伴关系的问责制和可持续性。