• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三年级药学专业学生的理性与经验性决策偏好

Rational and experiential decision-making preferences of third-year student pharmacists.

作者信息

McLaughlin Jacqueline E, Cox Wendy C, Williams Charlene R, Shepherd Greene

机构信息

Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Asheville, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Aug 15;78(6):120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe786120.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe786120
PMID:25147392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4140486/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the rational (systematic and rule-based) and experiential (fast and intuitive) decision-making preferences of student pharmacists, and to compare these preferences to the preferences of other health professionals and student populations.

METHODS

The Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI-40), a validated psychometric tool, was administered electronically to 114 third-year (P3) student pharmacists. Student demographics and preadmission data were collected. The REI-40 results were compared with student demographics and admissions data to identify possible correlations between these factors.

RESULTS

Mean REI-40 rational scores were higher than experiential scores. Rational scores for younger students were significantly higher than students aged 30 years and older (p<0.05). No significant differences were found based on gender, race, or the presence of a prior degree. All correlations between REI-40 scores and incoming grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) scores were weak.

CONCLUSION

Student pharmacists favored rational decision making over experiential decision making, which was similar to results of studies done of other health professions.

摘要

目的

研究药学专业学生基于理性(系统且基于规则)和经验(快速且直观)的决策偏好,并将这些偏好与其他卫生专业人员和学生群体的偏好进行比较。

方法

使用经过验证的心理测量工具——理性经验量表(REI - 40),对114名三年级(P3)药学专业学生进行电子测试。收集学生的人口统计学信息和入学前数据。将REI - 40的测试结果与学生人口统计学信息和入学数据进行比较,以确定这些因素之间可能存在的相关性。

结果

REI - 40的理性得分均值高于经验得分。年龄较小的学生的理性得分显著高于30岁及以上的学生(p<0.05)。基于性别、种族或是否拥有先前学位未发现显著差异。REI - 40得分与入学平均绩点(GPA)和药学院入学考试(PCAT)成绩之间的所有相关性均较弱。

结论

药学专业学生更倾向于理性决策而非经验决策,这与其他卫生专业的研究结果相似。

相似文献

1
Rational and experiential decision-making preferences of third-year student pharmacists.三年级药学专业学生的理性与经验性决策偏好
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Aug 15;78(6):120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe786120.
2
Relationship between Student Pharmacist Decision Making Preferences and Experiential Learning.学生药剂师决策偏好与体验式学习之间的关系
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Sep 25;80(7):119. doi: 10.5688/ajpe807119.
3
Experiential and rational decision making: a survey to determine how emergency physicians make clinical decisions.经验决策和理性决策:一项调查急诊医师如何做出临床决策的研究。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Oct;29(10):811-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200468. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
4
Admissions Criteria as Predictors of Academic Performance in a Three-Year Pharmacy Program at a Historically Black Institution.历史悠久的黑人院校三年制药学专业录取标准对学业表现的预测作用
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Feb 25;80(1):6. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8016.
5
Systematic Review of Predictors of Success for the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination.《北美药师执照考试成功预测因素的系统评价》
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Nov;85(10):8591. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8591. Epub 2021 May 11.
6
The Serbian validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory.塞尔维亚版理性情绪行为问卷-40 版和理性情绪多模态问卷的验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0294705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294705. eCollection 2023.
7
A Survey to Determine Decision-Making Styles of Working Paramedics and Student Paramedics.一项关于确定在职护理人员和实习护理人员决策风格的调查。
CJEM. 2016 May;18(3):213-22. doi: 10.1017/cem.2015.95. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
8
Do entry year pharmacy students have similar personal characteristics? Comparing personalities, professional goals, and role perceptions.入学年份的药学专业学生是否具有相似的个人特征?比较个性、专业目标和角色认知。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Apr;19(4):634-642. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
9
Assessment of student pharmacists' ethical decision-making.学生药剂师伦理决策的评估。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Nov;9(6):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
Influence of the Fear of Missing Out in Student Pharmacists' Decision to Pursue Residency Training.错过恐惧症对学生药剂师选择接受住院医师培训的决策的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Sep;83(7):7023. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7023.

引用本文的文献

1
Autistic people differ from non-autistic people subjectively, but not objectively in their reasoning.自闭症患者与非自闭症患者在主观上存在差异,但在推理方面并无客观差异。
Autism. 2025 Feb;29(2):355-366. doi: 10.1177/13623613241277055. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Why do you choose this program?-A decision-making model of medical students based on grounded theory.为什么选择这个项目?——基于扎根理论的医学生决策模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 15;18(9):e0291634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291634. eCollection 2023.
3
Clinicians' Perceptions of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Blood Utilization Calculator: Qualitative Exploratory Study.临床医生对基于人工智能的血液利用计算器的认知:定性探索性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Oct 31;9(4):e38411. doi: 10.2196/38411.
4
Use of Personality Frameworks in Health Science Education.人格框架在健康科学教育中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Aug;84(8):ajpe7231. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7231.
5
Preference of cognitive approaches for decision making among anesthesiologists' in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯麻醉医生决策时对认知方法的偏好
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Jul-Sep;13(3):191-196. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_792_18.
6
Clinical Decision-making among Emergency Physicians: Experiential or Rational?急诊医师的临床决策:经验性还是理性?
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(1-2):65-68. doi: 10.2991/j.jegh.2018.04.102.
7
Relationship between Student Pharmacist Decision Making Preferences and Experiential Learning.学生药剂师决策偏好与体验式学习之间的关系
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Sep 25;80(7):119. doi: 10.5688/ajpe807119.

本文引用的文献

1
Teaching clinical problem solving: a preceptor's guide.临床问题解决教学:导师指南。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Sep 15;69(18):1588-99. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110521.
2
Experiential and rational decision making: a survey to determine how emergency physicians make clinical decisions.经验决策和理性决策:一项调查急诊医师如何做出临床决策的研究。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Oct;29(10):811-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200468. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
3
When emotionality trumps reason: a study of individual processing style and juror bias.当情感战胜理智:个体加工风格与陪审员偏见研究。
Behav Sci Law. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):850-77. doi: 10.1002/bsl.939. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
4
Understanding pharmacist decision making for adverse drug event (ADE) detection.了解药剂师在检测药物不良事件(ADE)时的决策过程。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Apr;15(2):266-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00992.x.
5
Thinking styles and doctors' knowledge and behaviours relating to acute coronary syndromes guidelines.思维方式与医生对急性冠脉综合征指南的知识和行为的关系。
Implement Sci. 2008 Apr 25;3:23. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-23.
6
Implementation science: a role for parallel dual processing models of reasoning?实施科学:推理的并行双加工模型能发挥作用吗?
Implement Sci. 2006 May 25;1:12. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-12.
7
The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.理性与经验信息加工方式与人格、基本信念及比率偏差现象的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jun;76(6):972-87. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.972.
8
Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.直觉体验式与分析理性思维方式的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):390-405. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.390.
9
Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.认知无意识与心理动力无意识的整合。
Am Psychol. 1994 Aug;49(8):709-24. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.49.8.709.
10
Personality type and curriculum preference in primary care.初级保健中的人格类型与课程偏好
Med Educ. 1982 Mar;16(2):94-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1982.tb01231.x.