Sadoul Bastien C, Schuring Ewoud A H, Mela David J, Peters Harry P F
Unilever Research & Development Vlaardingen, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands.
Unilever Research & Development Vlaardingen, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands.
Appetite. 2014 Dec;83:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Several studies have assessed relationships of self-reported appetite (eating motivations, mainly by Visual Analogue Scales, VAS) with subsequent energy intake (EI), though usually in small data sets with limited power and variable designs. The objectives were therefore to better quantify the relationships of self-reports (incorporating subject characteristics) to subsequent EI, and to estimate the quantitative differences in VAS corresponding to consistent, significant differences in EI.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Data were derived from an opportunity sample of 23 randomized controlled studies involving 549 subjects, testing the effects of various food ingredients in meal replacers or 100-150 ml mini-drinks. In all studies, scores on several VAS were recorded for 30 min to 5 h post-meal, when EI was assessed by ad libitum meal consumption. The relationships between pre-meal VAS scores and EI were examined using correlation, linear models (including subject characteristics) and a cross-validation procedure.
VAS correlations with subsequent EI were statistically significant, but of low magnitude, up to r = 0.26. Hunger, age, gender, body weight and estimated basal metabolic rate explained 25% of the total variance in EI. Without hunger the prediction of EI was modestly but significantly lower (19%, P < 0.001). A change of ≥15-25 mm on a 100 mm VAS was the minimum effect consistently corresponding to a significant change in subsequent EI, depending on the starting VAS level.
Eating motivations add in a small but consistently significant way to other known predictors of acute EI. Differences of about 15 mm on a 100 mm VAS appear to be the minimum effect expected to result in consistent, significant differences in subsequent EI.
背景/目的:多项研究评估了自我报告的食欲(饮食动机,主要通过视觉模拟量表,VAS)与随后的能量摄入(EI)之间的关系,不过通常是在样本量小、功效有限且设计多变的数据集中进行。因此,本研究的目的是更好地量化自我报告(纳入受试者特征)与随后EI之间的关系,并估计与EI中一致、显著差异相对应的VAS定量差异。
受试者/方法:数据来自23项随机对照研究的机会样本,涉及549名受试者,测试了代餐食品或100 - 150毫升小饮料中各种食品成分的效果。在所有研究中,餐后30分钟至5小时记录几个VAS的得分,此时通过随意进食来评估EI。使用相关性、线性模型(包括受试者特征)和交叉验证程序检查餐前VAS得分与EI之间的关系。
VAS与随后EI的相关性具有统计学意义,但强度较低,最高r = 0.26。饥饿、年龄、性别、体重和估计的基础代谢率解释了EI总方差的25%。没有饥饿因素时,EI的预测值适度但显著降低(19%,P < 0.001)。根据起始VAS水平,100毫米VAS上≥15 - 25毫米的变化是与随后EI的显著变化始终对应的最小效应。
饮食动机对急性EI的其他已知预测因素有微小但始终显著的影响。100毫米VAS上约15毫米的差异似乎是预期会导致随后EI产生一致、显著差异的最小效应。