Deranlot Julien, Maurel Nathalie, Diop Amadou, Pratlong Nathalie, Roche Lucas, Tiemtore Roch, Nourissat Geoffroy
Clinique Drouot, Paris, France.
Equipe Biomécanique et Remodelage Osseux (EPBRO), Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Paris, France.
Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec;30(12):1569-73. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
This study aimed to evaluate the abrasive properties of different suture materials (tape or regular) on the infraspinatus tendon of sheep.
Four types of sutures were compared: FiberWire (Arthex, Naples FL), FiberTape (Arthrex), Orthocord (DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA) and ForceFiber (Tornier, Bloomington, MN). Each suture (n = 10) was cycled with a filxed load of 10 N and an alternating motion of the suture through sheep infraspinatus tendon, with an excursion of 30 mm. The migration of the suture as it cut through the tissue was measured at intervals of 5 cycles, up to failure or a total of 50 cycles, or a tendon tear greater than 13 mm.
ForceFiber and Orthocord sutures showed a significantly (P < .05) lower amount of abrasion compared with FiberWire and FiberTape: The mean cutting rate (defined as the size of the defect at the end of the test divided by 50 when this number of cycles was reached, or as 13 mm divided by the number of cycles to reach this value when the test was stopped before 50 cycles) was, respectively, 0.04 mm/cycle, 0.12 mm/cycle, 0.11 mm/cycle, 0.32 mm/cycle, and 0.25 mm/cycle. The defect size at 15 cycles was, respectively, 5.7 mm, 5.6 mm, 9.4 mm, 7.7 mm, and 7.4 mm. Although no statistical significance was found, sutures shaped in a tape form (FiberTape) were less aggressive on the tendon than the corresponding sutures in regular form (FiberWire).
This study found increased abrasive effects of FiberWire and FiberTape compared with ForceFiber and Orthocord sutures.
Currently, surgeons have a large choice of suture materials. Knowledge of biomechanical characteristics of different braided polyblend suture materials could help surgeons decide which suture to use for rotator cuff tears.
本研究旨在评估不同缝合材料(带线或常规)对绵羊冈下肌腱的磨损特性。
比较了四种类型的缝线:FiberWire(Arthex,那不勒斯,佛罗里达州)、FiberTape(Arthrex)、Orthocord(DePuy Mitek,雷纳姆,马萨诸塞州)和ForceFiber(Tornier,布卢明顿,明尼苏达州)。每种缝线(n = 10)在10 N的固定负荷下循环,并在绵羊冈下肌腱中进行缝线的交替运动,偏移量为30 mm。在每5个循环的间隔测量缝线切割组织时的迁移情况,直至失效或总共50个循环,或肌腱撕裂大于13 mm。
与FiberWire和FiberTape相比,ForceFiber和Orthocord缝线的磨损量显著更低(P <.05):平均切割速率(定义为达到50个循环时试验结束时的缺损大小除以该循环数,或在50个循环之前试验停止时达到该值的循环数除以13 mm)分别为0.04 mm/循环、0.12 mm/循环、0.11 mm/循环、0.32 mm/循环和0.25 mm/循环。15个循环时的缺损大小分别为5.7 mm、5.6 mm、9.4 mm、7.7 mm和7.4 mm。虽然未发现统计学意义,但带线形式(FiberTape)的缝线对肌腱的侵蚀性低于相应的常规形式缝线(FiberWire)。
本研究发现,与ForceFiber和Orthocord缝线相比,FiberWire和FiberTape的磨损效应增加。
目前,外科医生有多种缝合材料可供选择。了解不同编织聚混纺缝合材料的生物力学特性有助于外科医生决定用于肩袖撕裂的缝合线。