Li W, Shi Q, Wang W, Liu J, Ren J, Li Q, Hou F
Oncology Department, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Shanghai TCM University, Shanghai, China.
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;16(11):O370-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12749.
This study reviewed the association between KRAS mutation and resistance to treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
A search was carried out of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases (to November 2013) without language restrictions.
Ten studies were included in the final meta-analysis, consisting of 1339 patients with mCRC, of whom 427 (32%) had a KRAS mutation. The objective response rate (ORR) of mCRC patients with KRAS mutation was 8% (33/427), whereas the ORR of mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS was 34% (306/912). The overall pooled response rate (RR) for the ORR was 1.297 (95% CI 1.244-1.353, P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis comparing cetuximab monotherapy treatment with cetuximab plus chemotherapy, showed a pooled RR of 1.26 (95% CI 1.12-0.63, P < 0.01) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.25-1.36, P < 0.01), respectively. For patients receiving anti-EGFR with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) given as first-line treatment or not, the pooled RRs were 1.34 (95% CI 1.23-1.46, P < 0.01) and 1.29 (95% CI 1.23-1.35, P < 0.01). The data on progression-free survival from five studies in the meta-analysis gave a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.99 with a 95% CI of 1.69-2.29. Finally, the data for overall survival in mCRC patients were pooled from the only three studies reporting the HR (1.80; 95% CI 1.50-2.10). None of the results had any evidence of heterogeneity.
All the results favoured a stronger link between mutant KRAS and anti-EGFR mAb, but due to a mutually exclusive relationship between KRAS and other gene mutations the clinical usefulness of KRAS mutation as a selection marker for sensitivity to EGFR TKIs in mCRC is limited.
本研究回顾了转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中KRAS突变与表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗耐药之间的关联。
对PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库(截至2013年11月)进行检索,无语言限制。
最终的荟萃分析纳入了10项研究,共1339例mCRC患者,其中427例(32%)有KRAS突变。KRAS突变的mCRC患者的客观缓解率(ORR)为8%(33/427),而KRAS野生型的mCRC患者的ORR为34%(306/912)。ORR的总体合并缓解率(RR)为1.297(95%CI 1.244 - 1.353,P < 0.01)。比较西妥昔单抗单药治疗与西妥昔单抗联合化疗的亚组分析显示,合并RR分别为1.26(95%CI 1.12 - 0.63,P < 0.01)和1.30(95%CI 1.25 - 1.36,P < 0.01)。对于接受抗EGFR单克隆抗体(mAb)一线治疗与否的患者,合并RR分别为1.34(95%CI 1.23 - 1.46,P < 0.01)和1.29(95%CI 1.23 - 1.35,P < 0.01)。荟萃分析中五项研究的无进展生存数据得出风险比(HR)为1.99,95%CI为1.69 - 2.29。最后,mCRC患者总生存数据来自仅有的三项报告HR的研究(1.80;95%CI 1.50 - 2.10)。所有结果均无任何异质性证据。
所有结果均支持突变型KRAS与抗EGFR mAb之间存在更强的关联,但由于KRAS与其他基因突变之间存在相互排斥关系,KRAS突变作为mCRC中EGFR TKIs敏感性选择标志物的临床实用性有限。