• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

KRAS状态与转移性结直肠癌患者对表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的耐药性:一项荟萃分析

KRAS status and resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li W, Shi Q, Wang W, Liu J, Ren J, Li Q, Hou F

机构信息

Oncology Department, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Shanghai TCM University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;16(11):O370-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12749.

DOI:10.1111/codi.12749
PMID:25155261
Abstract

AIM

This study reviewed the association between KRAS mutation and resistance to treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHOD

A search was carried out of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases (to November 2013) without language restrictions.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the final meta-analysis, consisting of 1339 patients with mCRC, of whom 427 (32%) had a KRAS mutation. The objective response rate (ORR) of mCRC patients with KRAS mutation was 8% (33/427), whereas the ORR of mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS was 34% (306/912). The overall pooled response rate (RR) for the ORR was 1.297 (95% CI 1.244-1.353, P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis comparing cetuximab monotherapy treatment with cetuximab plus chemotherapy, showed a pooled RR of 1.26 (95% CI 1.12-0.63, P < 0.01) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.25-1.36, P < 0.01), respectively. For patients receiving anti-EGFR with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) given as first-line treatment or not, the pooled RRs were 1.34 (95% CI 1.23-1.46, P < 0.01) and 1.29 (95% CI 1.23-1.35, P < 0.01). The data on progression-free survival from five studies in the meta-analysis gave a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.99 with a 95% CI of 1.69-2.29. Finally, the data for overall survival in mCRC patients were pooled from the only three studies reporting the HR (1.80; 95% CI 1.50-2.10). None of the results had any evidence of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

All the results favoured a stronger link between mutant KRAS and anti-EGFR mAb, but due to a mutually exclusive relationship between KRAS and other gene mutations the clinical usefulness of KRAS mutation as a selection marker for sensitivity to EGFR TKIs in mCRC is limited.

摘要

目的

本研究回顾了转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中KRAS突变与表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗耐药之间的关联。

方法

对PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库(截至2013年11月)进行检索,无语言限制。

结果

最终的荟萃分析纳入了10项研究,共1339例mCRC患者,其中427例(32%)有KRAS突变。KRAS突变的mCRC患者的客观缓解率(ORR)为8%(33/427),而KRAS野生型的mCRC患者的ORR为34%(306/912)。ORR的总体合并缓解率(RR)为1.297(95%CI 1.244 - 1.353,P < 0.01)。比较西妥昔单抗单药治疗与西妥昔单抗联合化疗的亚组分析显示,合并RR分别为1.26(95%CI 1.12 - 0.63,P < 0.01)和1.30(95%CI 1.25 - 1.36,P < 0.01)。对于接受抗EGFR单克隆抗体(mAb)一线治疗与否的患者,合并RR分别为1.34(95%CI 1.23 - 1.46,P < 0.01)和1.29(95%CI 1.23 - 1.35,P < 0.01)。荟萃分析中五项研究的无进展生存数据得出风险比(HR)为1.99,95%CI为1.69 - 2.29。最后,mCRC患者总生存数据来自仅有的三项报告HR的研究(1.80;95%CI 1.50 - 2.10)。所有结果均无任何异质性证据。

结论

所有结果均支持突变型KRAS与抗EGFR mAb之间存在更强的关联,但由于KRAS与其他基因突变之间存在相互排斥关系,KRAS突变作为mCRC中EGFR TKIs敏感性选择标志物的临床实用性有限。

相似文献

1
KRAS status and resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.KRAS状态与转移性结直肠癌患者对表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的耐药性:一项荟萃分析
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;16(11):O370-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12749.
2
PIK3CA exon 20 mutations as a potential biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PIK3CA 外显子 20 突变作为 KRAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌抗 EGFR 单克隆抗体耐药的潜在生物标志物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jun;23(6):1518-25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr464. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
3
Association between KRAS codon 13 mutations and clinical response to anti-EGFR treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a meta-analysis.KRAS 密码子 13 突变与转移性结直肠癌患者抗 EGFR 治疗临床反应的相关性:来自荟萃分析的结果。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;71(1):265-72. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2005-9. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
4
Activating KRAS mutations and overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor as independent predictors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.KRAS 基因突变激活和表皮生长因子受体过表达是西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的独立预测指标。
Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):254-60. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc9d96.
5
Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体治疗转移性结直肠癌的荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 14;21(14):4365-72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4365.
6
KRAS p.G13D mutation and codon 12 mutations are not created equal in predicting clinical outcomes of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.KRAS p.G13D 突变与 12 号密码子突变在预测转移性结直肠癌患者接受西妥昔单抗治疗的临床结局方面并非等效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):714-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27804. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
7
Predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a meta-analysis of 22 studies.KRAS 基因突变对接受西妥昔单抗治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的预测和预后价值:22 项研究的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Oct;46(15):2781-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.05.022. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
8
The predictive value of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.KRAS、NRAS、BRAF、PIK3CA和PTEN对转移性结直肠癌抗表皮生长因子受体治疗的预测价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):852-64. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.895036. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
9
Efficacy and toxicity of adding cetuximab to chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis from 12 randomized controlled trials.在转移性结直肠癌治疗中,化疗联合西妥昔单抗的疗效与毒性:一项来自12项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Tumour Biol. 2014 Dec;35(12):11741-50. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2227-z. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
10
Systematic review: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment effect modification by KRAS mutations in advanced colorectal cancer.系统评价:KRAS 突变对晚期结直肠癌抗表皮生长因子受体治疗效果的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 4;154(1):37-49. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
p.G12C Mutation in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Prognostic Implications and Advancements in Targeted Therapies.转移性结直肠癌中的p.G12C突变:预后意义及靶向治疗进展
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;15(14):3579. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143579.
2
Capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine in maintenance treatment for untreated characterised KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis in Chinese postmenopausal women.卡培他滨联合贝伐单抗与卡培他滨用于未经治疗的KRAS外显子2野生型转移性结直肠癌维持治疗的对比:中国绝经后女性的回顾性分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0916-6.
3
Performance of probe polymerization-conjunction-agarose gel electrophoresis in the rapid detection of KRAS gene mutation.
探针聚合-连接-琼脂糖凝胶电泳在KRAS基因突变快速检测中的性能
Genet Mol Biol. 2018;41(3):555-561. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0197. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
4
The Nrf2 inhibitor brusatol is a potent antitumour agent in an orthotopic mouse model of colorectal cancer.Nrf2抑制剂布沙托林在结直肠癌原位小鼠模型中是一种有效的抗肿瘤药物。
Oncotarget. 2018 Jun 5;9(43):27104-27116. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25497.
5
Molecular subtypes of colorectal cancers determined by PCR-based analysis.基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析确定的结直肠癌分子亚型
Cancer Sci. 2017 Mar;108(3):427-434. doi: 10.1111/cas.13164.
6
Dual Inhibition of MEK and PI3K Pathway in KRAS and BRAF Mutated Colorectal Cancers.KRAS和BRAF突变型结直肠癌中MEK和PI3K通路的双重抑制
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Sep 23;16(9):22976-88. doi: 10.3390/ijms160922976.