Leichtfried Veronika, Matteucci Gothe Raffaella, Kantner-Rumplmair Wilhelm, Mair-Raggautz Maria, Bartenbach Christian, Guggenbichler Helmut, Gehmacher Dieter, Jonas Leonore, Aigner Martin, Winkler Dietmar, Schobersberger Wolfgang
Department of Medical Sciences and Health System Management, Institute for Sports Medicine, Alpine Medicine & Health Tourism, UMIT, Hall in Tyrol, Austria.
Pain Med. 2014 Dec;15(12):2003-12. doi: 10.1111/pme.12503. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
The present trial evaluated incorporation of bright light therapy in the treatment of chronic nonspecific back pain (CNBP).
A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open design with three parallel trial arms was used.
Subjects received a novel therapeutic, an expected therapeutic ineffective low dose, or no light exposure at three different medical centers.
A total of 125 CNBP patients reporting pain intensity of ≥3 points on item 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were included.
Over 3 weeks, 36 active treatment, 36 placebo controls, and 33 controls received 3 or no supplementary light exposures of 5.000 lx or 230 lx, respectively.
Changes in self-reported scores of pain intensity (BPI sub-score 1) and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Questionnaire) were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures were changes in self-reported overall pain sensation (BPI total score), grade of everyday life impairment (BPI sub-score 2), mood (visual analog scale), and well-being (World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index).
Changes in pain intensity were higher (1.0 [0.8-1.6]) in the bright light group compared with controls (0.3 [-0.1-0.8]; effect size D = 0.46). Changes in the depression score were also higher in the intervention group (1.5 [0.0-2.5]) compared with controls (0.0 [0.0-2.0]; effect size D = 0.86). No differences were seen in change scores between intervention vs sham group.
The present randomized controlled trial shows that light therapy even in low dose could improve depressive symptoms and reduce pain intensity in CNBP patients. Further research is needed for optimizing parameters of frequency, dose, and duration of therapeutic light exposure.
本试验评估了强光疗法在慢性非特异性背痛(CNBP)治疗中的应用。
采用前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心、开放设计,设有三个平行试验组。
受试者在三个不同的医疗中心分别接受一种新型治疗、预期无效的低剂量治疗或无光照暴露。
共纳入125例慢性非特异性背痛患者,这些患者在简短疼痛问卷(BPI)第5项中报告疼痛强度≥3分。
在3周内,36例积极治疗组、36例安慰剂对照组和33例对照组分别接受3次或不接受5000勒克斯或230勒克斯的补充光照。
疼痛强度(BPI子评分1)和抑郁(医院焦虑抑郁量表)的自我报告评分变化是主要观察指标。次要观察指标包括自我报告的总体疼痛感觉(BPI总分)、日常生活受损程度(BPI子评分2)、情绪(视觉模拟量表)和幸福感(世界卫生组织五福指数)的变化。
与对照组(0.3 [-0.1 - 0.8];效应量D = 0.46)相比,强光组的疼痛强度变化更高(1.0 [0.8 - 1.6])。与对照组(0.0 [0.0 - 2.0];效应量D = 0.86)相比,干预组的抑郁评分变化也更高(1.5 [0.0 - 2.5])。干预组与假手术组之间的变化评分无差异。
本随机对照试验表明,即使是低剂量的光疗法也可以改善慢性非特异性背痛患者的抑郁症状并降低疼痛强度。需要进一步研究以优化治疗性光照暴露的频率、剂量和持续时间参数。