Georgetown University Medical Center; Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA; and Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY
Georgetown University Medical Center; Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA; and Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY.
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):e1-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001288. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
Breast cancer chemotherapy toxicity is not well documented outside of randomized trials. We developed and conducted preliminary evaluation of an algorithm to detect grade 3 and 4 toxicities using electronic data from a large integrated managed care organization.
The algorithm used administrative, pharmacy, and electronic data from outpatient, emergency room, and inpatient records of 99 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2009 who underwent chemotherapy. Data were abstracted for 12 months post-treatment initiation (24 months for trastuzumab recipients). An oncology nurse independently blindly reviewed records; these results were the "gold standard." Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for overall toxicity, categories of toxicities, and toxicity by age or regimen. The algorithm was applied to an independent sample of 1,575 patients with breast cancer diagnosed during the study period to estimate prevalence rates.
The overall sensitivity for detecting chemotherapy-related toxicity was 89% (95% CI, 77% to 95%). The highest sensitivity was for identification of hematologic toxicities (97%; 95% CI, 84% to 99%). There were good sensitivities for infectious toxicity, but rates dropped for GI and neurological toxicities. Specificity was high within each category (89% to 99%), but when combined to measure any toxicity, it was lower (70%; 95% CI, 57% to 81%). When applied to an independent chemotherapy sample, the algorithm estimates a 26% rate of hematologic toxicity; rates were higher among patients age ≥ 65 years versus less than 65 years.
If validated in other samples and health care settings, algorithms to capture toxicity could be useful in comparative and cost-effectiveness evaluations of community practice-delivered treatment.
乳腺癌化疗毒性在随机试验之外的记录并不完善。我们开发并初步评估了一种算法,该算法使用来自大型综合管理式医疗组织的电子数据来检测 3 级和 4 级毒性。
该算法使用了 99 名 2006 年至 2009 年间被诊断患有乳腺癌并接受化疗的女性的门诊、急诊室和住院记录中的行政、药房和电子数据。在治疗开始后(曲妥珠单抗患者为 24 个月)的 12 个月内对数据进行了提取。一位肿瘤护士独立地盲目审查了记录;这些结果为“金标准”。计算了整体毒性、毒性类别以及按年龄或方案的毒性的敏感性和特异性。该算法应用于研究期间诊断出的 1575 名乳腺癌独立患者样本中,以估计患病率。
检测化疗相关毒性的总体敏感性为 89%(95%置信区间,77%至 95%)。识别血液学毒性的敏感性最高(97%;95%置信区间,84%至 99%)。感染毒性的敏感性较好,但胃肠道和神经毒性的发生率下降。每个类别内的特异性都很高(89%至 99%),但综合起来测量任何毒性时,特异性则较低(70%;95%置信区间,57%至 81%)。当应用于独立的化疗样本时,该算法估计血液学毒性的发生率为 26%;年龄≥65 岁的患者的发生率高于年龄<65 岁的患者。
如果在其他样本和医疗环境中得到验证,那么捕获毒性的算法可能有助于对社区实践提供的治疗进行比较和成本效益评估。