• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Preliminary Development and Evaluation of an Algorithm to Identify Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Toxicities Using Electronic Medical Records and Administrative Data.基于电子病历和行政数据的乳腺癌化疗毒性识别算法的初步开发和评估。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):e1-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001288. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
2
Measuring clinically significant chemotherapy-related toxicities using Medicare claims from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial participants.利用来自癌症与白血病B组(CALGB)试验参与者的医疗保险理赔数据来衡量具有临床意义的化疗相关毒性。
Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):303-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815cecc3.
3
Validation of pediatric diabetes case identification approaches for diagnosed cases by using information in the electronic health records of a large integrated managed health care organization.利用大型综合管理医疗保健组织的电子健康记录中的信息验证经诊断的儿童糖尿病病例识别方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jan 1;179(1):27-38. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt230. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
4
Risk of heart failure in breast cancer patients after anthracycline and trastuzumab treatment: a retrospective cohort study.蒽环类和曲妥珠单抗治疗后乳腺癌患者心力衰竭的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Sep 5;104(17):1293-305. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs317.
5
Real-world evaluation of effectiveness and tolerance of chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer in older women.真实世界中老年女性早期乳腺癌化疗的有效性和耐受性评估。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;182(2):247-258. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05684-5. Epub 2020 May 23.
6
Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Trastuzumab Is Safe and Effective in Older Women With Small, Node-Negative, HER2-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer.辅助化疗和曲妥珠单抗治疗对老年、肿瘤小、无淋巴结转移、HER2阳性早期乳腺癌女性患者安全有效。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Dec;16(6):487-493. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
Results of two open-label, multicenter phase II studies of docetaxel, platinum salts, and trastuzumab in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.多西他赛、铂类药物及曲妥珠单抗用于HER2阳性晚期乳腺癌的两项开放标签多中心II期研究结果
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 May 19;96(10):759-69. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh133.
8
Administrative data algorithms to identify second breast cancer events following early-stage invasive breast cancer.用于识别早期浸润性乳腺癌后第二乳腺癌事件的行政数据算法。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jun 20;104(12):931-40. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs233. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
9
[Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab plus different chemotherapy regimens in treatment of the patients with HER-2-positive advanced breast cancer].曲妥珠单抗联合不同化疗方案治疗HER-2阳性晚期乳腺癌患者的疗效与安全性
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014 May;36(5):372-6.
10
Toxicity profile of Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide and Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide followed by Paclitaxel regimen and its associated factors among women with breast cancer in Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study.多柔比星-环磷酰胺及多柔比星-环磷酰胺序贯紫杉醇方案在埃塞俄比亚乳腺癌女性中的毒性特征及其相关因素:一项前瞻性队列研究
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Dec;26(8):1912-1920. doi: 10.1177/1078155220907658. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Pre-Existing Frailty on Cardiotoxicity Among Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Therapy.既往虚弱对接受辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者心脏毒性的影响。
JACC CardioOncol. 2025 Feb;7(2):110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.10.012. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
2
Value-based digital health: A systematic literature review of the value elements of digital health care.基于价值的数字健康:数字医疗保健价值要素的系统文献综述
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 13;10:20552076241277438. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277438. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
The associations of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, sociodemographic characteristics, and clinical characteristics with time to fall in older adults with colorectal cancer.奥沙利铂诱导的周围神经病变、社会人口统计学特征和临床特征与老年结直肠癌患者跌倒时间的关系。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 3;193(9):1271-1280. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae067.
4
Navigating the Complexities of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Real-World Data Collection for Oncology Pharmacovigilance.人工智能驱动的肿瘤药物警戒真实世界数据采集的复杂性探讨。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 May;8:e2400051. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00051.
5
Adjuvant Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.绝经前激素受体阳性乳腺癌的辅助卵巢功能抑制。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242082. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2082.
6
The association between sociodemographic, clinical, and potentially preventive therapies with oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients.结直肠癌患者奥沙利铂诱导的周围神经病变与社会人口学、临床和潜在预防治疗的相关性。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 9;31(7):386. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07850-z.
7
Variation in the Assessment of Immune-Related Adverse Event Occurrence, Grade, and Timing in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗患者免疫相关不良事件发生、分级和时间评估的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11519.
8
Factors associated with insufficient awareness of breast cancer among women in Northern and Eastern China: a case-control study.中国北方和东部女性乳腺癌认知不足的相关因素:一项病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 20;8(2):e018523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018523.
9
Frailty and long-term mortality of older breast cancer patients: CALGB 369901 (Alliance).老年乳腺癌患者的衰弱与长期死亡率:CALGB 369901(联盟研究)
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;164(1):107-117. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4222-8. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Using electronic medical record data to report laboratory adverse events.利用电子病历数据报告实验室不良事件。
Br J Haematol. 2017 Apr;177(2):283-286. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14538. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2014.癌症统计数据,2014 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
2
Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).对美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)进行认知访谈。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):257-69. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0470-1. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
3
Specialty pharmaceuticals care management in an integrated health care delivery system with electronic health records.在具有电子健康记录的综合医疗服务体系中的专科药物护理管理。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 May;19(4):334-44. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.4.334.
4
Benefit and harms of new anti-cancer drugs.新型抗癌药物的获益与危害。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;15(3):270-5. doi: 10.1007/s11912-013-0303-y.
5
Patterns and predictors of breast cancer chemotherapy use in Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2004-2007.2004-2007 年 Kaiser Permanente 北加利福尼亚分部乳腺癌化疗应用的模式和预测因子。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jan;137(1):247-60. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2329-5. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
6
Cancer- and cancer treatment-associated cognitive change: an update on the state of the science.癌症及癌症治疗相关认知功能改变:科学研究现状更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 20;30(30):3675-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.0116. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
7
Paying for personalized care: cancer biomarkers and comparative effectiveness.支付个性化医疗费用:癌症生物标志物和比较疗效。
Mol Oncol. 2012 Apr;6(2):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
8
Sensitivity of Medicare claims data for measuring use of standard multiagent chemotherapy regimens.医疗保险索赔数据测量标准多药化疗方案使用情况的敏感性。
Med Care. 2014 Mar;52(3):e15-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824e342f.
9
Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems.电子健康记录系统的优缺点。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47-55. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S12985. Epub 2011 May 11.
10
Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer.基于基因组检测的化疗在早期淋巴结阳性乳腺癌中的经济学评价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jan 4;104(1):56-66. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr484. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

基于电子病历和行政数据的乳腺癌化疗毒性识别算法的初步开发和评估。

Preliminary Development and Evaluation of an Algorithm to Identify Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Toxicities Using Electronic Medical Records and Administrative Data.

机构信息

Georgetown University Medical Center; Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA; and Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY

Georgetown University Medical Center; Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA; and Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):e1-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001288. Epub 2014 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2013.001288
PMID:25161127
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4295421/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Breast cancer chemotherapy toxicity is not well documented outside of randomized trials. We developed and conducted preliminary evaluation of an algorithm to detect grade 3 and 4 toxicities using electronic data from a large integrated managed care organization.

METHODS

The algorithm used administrative, pharmacy, and electronic data from outpatient, emergency room, and inpatient records of 99 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2009 who underwent chemotherapy. Data were abstracted for 12 months post-treatment initiation (24 months for trastuzumab recipients). An oncology nurse independently blindly reviewed records; these results were the "gold standard." Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for overall toxicity, categories of toxicities, and toxicity by age or regimen. The algorithm was applied to an independent sample of 1,575 patients with breast cancer diagnosed during the study period to estimate prevalence rates.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity for detecting chemotherapy-related toxicity was 89% (95% CI, 77% to 95%). The highest sensitivity was for identification of hematologic toxicities (97%; 95% CI, 84% to 99%). There were good sensitivities for infectious toxicity, but rates dropped for GI and neurological toxicities. Specificity was high within each category (89% to 99%), but when combined to measure any toxicity, it was lower (70%; 95% CI, 57% to 81%). When applied to an independent chemotherapy sample, the algorithm estimates a 26% rate of hematologic toxicity; rates were higher among patients age ≥ 65 years versus less than 65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

If validated in other samples and health care settings, algorithms to capture toxicity could be useful in comparative and cost-effectiveness evaluations of community practice-delivered treatment.

摘要

目的

乳腺癌化疗毒性在随机试验之外的记录并不完善。我们开发并初步评估了一种算法,该算法使用来自大型综合管理式医疗组织的电子数据来检测 3 级和 4 级毒性。

方法

该算法使用了 99 名 2006 年至 2009 年间被诊断患有乳腺癌并接受化疗的女性的门诊、急诊室和住院记录中的行政、药房和电子数据。在治疗开始后(曲妥珠单抗患者为 24 个月)的 12 个月内对数据进行了提取。一位肿瘤护士独立地盲目审查了记录;这些结果为“金标准”。计算了整体毒性、毒性类别以及按年龄或方案的毒性的敏感性和特异性。该算法应用于研究期间诊断出的 1575 名乳腺癌独立患者样本中,以估计患病率。

结果

检测化疗相关毒性的总体敏感性为 89%(95%置信区间,77%至 95%)。识别血液学毒性的敏感性最高(97%;95%置信区间,84%至 99%)。感染毒性的敏感性较好,但胃肠道和神经毒性的发生率下降。每个类别内的特异性都很高(89%至 99%),但综合起来测量任何毒性时,特异性则较低(70%;95%置信区间,57%至 81%)。当应用于独立的化疗样本时,该算法估计血液学毒性的发生率为 26%;年龄≥65 岁的患者的发生率高于年龄<65 岁的患者。

结论

如果在其他样本和医疗环境中得到验证,那么捕获毒性的算法可能有助于对社区实践提供的治疗进行比较和成本效益评估。