Suppr超能文献

神经认知功能是否会影响对情绪刺激的认知偏差?一般注意力能力与对威胁的注意偏向之间的关系。

Does neurocognitive function affect cognitive bias toward an emotional stimulus? Association between general attentional ability and attentional bias toward threat.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, The University of Tokyo Tokyo, Japan ; Department of Health Sciences, Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences Kanagawa, Japan.

Department of Psychology, University of Toyama Toyama, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 12;5:881. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00881. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although poorer cognitive performance has been found to be associated with anxiety, it remains unclear whether neurocognitive function affects biased cognitive processing toward emotional information. We investigated whether general cognitive function evaluated with a standard neuropsychological test predicts biased cognition, focusing on attentional bias toward threat.

METHODS

One hundred and five healthy young adults completed a dot-probe task measuring attentional bias and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) measuring general cognitive function, which consists of five domains: immediate memory, visuospatial/constructional, language, attention, and delayed memory. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between attentional bias and cognitive function.

RESULTS

The attentional domain was the best predictor of attentional bias toward threat (β = -0.26, p = 0.006). Within the attentional domain, digit symbol coding was negatively correlated with attentional bias (r = -0.28, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides the first evidence that general attentional ability, which was assessed with a standard neuropsychological test, affects attentional bias toward threatening information. Individual cognitive profiles might be important for the measurement and modification of cognitive biases.

摘要

背景

虽然较差的认知表现与焦虑有关,但神经认知功能是否会影响对情绪信息的偏见认知处理仍不清楚。我们研究了使用标准神经心理学测试评估的一般认知功能是否预测偏见认知,重点是对威胁的注意偏向。

方法

105 名健康年轻成年人完成了一个点探测任务,该任务测量了注意偏向,以及重复神经心理评估量表(RBANS)测量了一般认知功能,包括五个领域:即时记忆、视觉空间/结构、语言、注意力和延迟记忆。进行逐步多元回归分析以检验注意偏向与认知功能之间的关系。

结果

注意力域是威胁注意偏向的最佳预测因子(β = -0.26,p = 0.006)。在注意力域中,数字符号编码与注意力偏向呈负相关(r = -0.28,p = 0.005)。

结论

本研究首次提供了证据表明,使用标准神经心理学测试评估的一般注意力能力会影响对威胁信息的注意偏向。个体认知特征对于认知偏差的测量和修正可能很重要。

相似文献

2
Moderators of age effects on attention bias toward threat and its association with anxiety.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jul;216:46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.048. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
4
Attentional bias modification in reducing test anxiety vulnerability: a randomized controlled trial.
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1517-6.
5
Predictive Attentional Bias Modification Induces Stimulus-Evoked Attentional Bias for Threat.
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Sep 27;15(3):479-490. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i3.1633. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Assessing attentional biases with stuttering.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jan;51(1):84-94. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12187. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Attentional biases and memory for emotional stimuli in men and male rhesus monkeys.
Anim Cogn. 2013 Nov;16(6):861-71. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0618-y. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Memory bias for emotional facial expressions in major depression.
Cogn Emot. 2003 Jan;17(1):101-122. doi: 10.1080/02699930302272.
3
Don't panic: interpretation bias is predictive of new onsets of panic disorder.
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Jan;28(1):83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
4
Higher cortisol levels at diurnal trough predict greater attentional bias towards threat in healthy young adults.
J Affect Disord. 2013 Nov;151(2):775-779. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.031. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
5
Prefrontal control of attention to threat.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Feb 5;7:24. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00024. eCollection 2013.
6
Neural correlates of attention bias to threat in post-traumatic stress disorder.
Biol Psychol. 2012 May;90(2):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
7
A meta-analysis of the magnitude of biased attention in depression.
Depress Anxiety. 2010 Dec;27(12):1135-42. doi: 10.1002/da.20755.
8
Implicit cognition and depression: a meta-analysis.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):691-709. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 May 21.
9
Cortical areas related to performance of WAIS Digit Symbol Test: a functional imaging study.
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Sep 29;463(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.048. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验