Auburn University, United States.
Auburn University, United States.
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Jun;81:102416. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102416. Epub 2021 May 9.
Theory and empirical evidence suggest that those with higher posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms and better attentional control (i.e., the strategic control of higher-order executive attention in regulating bottom-up, stimulus driven responses to prepotent stimuli; Sarapas et al., 2017) can use that ability to disengage and shift attention away from threat stimuli and reduce threat-related attentional dysregulation (i.e., avoidance/overcontrollers). Those with relatively worse attentional control lack the requisite resources to do this, leading to prolonged attentional engagement with threat stimuli and threat-related attention dysregulation (i.e., maintenance/undercontrollers). Given that attentional control is a limited resource, strategic avoidance of threat information or reduced threat-related attention dysregulation may not be possible among those with relatively higher attentional control when cognitive load is relatively high. To test this hypothesis, the interaction between PTS symptoms, attentional control, and cognitive load was examined as a predictor of threat-related attentional bias and threat-related attention bias variability. Participants (N = 125 undergraduate students) were randomly assigned to high or low load conditions. Participants completed self-report measures of PTS symptoms, a behavioral measure of attentional control, and a novel task that assessed threat-related attentional bias via eye movements and threat-related attention bias variability via button press. The results of a series of hierarchical regressions showed that attentional control moderated the relationship between PTS symptoms and threat-related attention bias variability in the low, but not high, load condition. This moderation effect was not observed for threat-related attentional bias assessed via eye-tracking. Consistent with theory, under conditions of higher cognitive load, overcontrollers may not be able to use attentional control to consistently regulate threat-related attention. Study findings suggest that it may be important to consider contextual factors that increase cognitive load, as well as individual differences in attentional control, when developing attention bias modification interventions to reduce PTS symptomatology.
理论和实证证据表明,那些创伤后应激(PTS)症状较高且注意力控制能力较好的人(即,通过策略性地控制高级执行注意力,调节对优势刺激的自下而上、刺激驱动的反应;Sarapas 等人,2017)可以利用这种能力从威胁刺激中解脱出来,并将注意力转移开,从而减少与威胁相关的注意力失调(即,回避/过度控制者)。那些注意力控制能力相对较差的人缺乏必要的资源来做到这一点,导致他们长时间地与威胁刺激和与威胁相关的注意力失调(即,维持/不足控制者)保持注意力接触。鉴于注意力控制是一种有限的资源,当认知负荷较高时,那些注意力控制相对较高的人可能无法通过策略性地回避威胁信息或减少与威胁相关的注意力失调来实现这一点。为了检验这一假设,研究考察了 PTS 症状、注意力控制和认知负荷之间的相互作用,作为与威胁相关的注意力偏差和与威胁相关的注意力偏差可变性的预测指标。参与者(N=125 名大学生)被随机分配到高或低负荷条件下。参与者完成了 PTS 症状的自我报告测量、注意力控制的行为测量,以及一项新任务,该任务通过眼动评估与威胁相关的注意力偏差,通过按钮按压评估与威胁相关的注意力偏差可变性。一系列层次回归的结果表明,在低负荷条件下,注意力控制调节了 PTS 症状与与威胁相关的注意力偏差可变性之间的关系,但在高负荷条件下则没有。通过眼动追踪评估与威胁相关的注意力偏差时,没有观察到这种调节作用。与理论一致,在认知负荷较高的情况下,过度控制者可能无法使用注意力控制来始终如一地调节与威胁相关的注意力。研究结果表明,在开发注意力偏差修正干预措施以减轻 PTS 症状时,考虑增加认知负荷的环境因素以及注意力控制的个体差异可能很重要。