West Michael, Targett Pamela, Wehman Paul, Cifu Gabriella, Davis Jacob
Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, VA , USA.
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(12):1055-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.955133. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
The objective of this study was to examine job separations from supported employment (SE). The aim was to identify the types and nature of separations and precipitating events leading to the separation.
A retrospective chart review methodology was utilized. The study was conducted in a metropolitan area in the Southeast United States by a university-based SE program. Participants were 47 SE clients who had been placed into and separated from 67 jobs. Using a coding form, information regarding the type of separation and issues that preceded the separation were recorded. Data were aggregated using descriptive statistics.
The largest number of separations was due to termination, followed by resignation and mutual consent of the employer and employee. The mean number of issues leading to the separation was 2.2, ranging from one to five. Only eight positive issues were found (compared to 116 negative and 20 neutral), the most prevalent being entry into an educational or training program. Common negative issues included poor work performance, attendance and punctuality problems, conflicts with the supervisor, and social and behavioral issues.
The findings of this study illustrate the need to address job retention issues during the job development process, finding the most appropriate person-job fit and workplace culture for each client. The findings also support the need for vigilant and regular communication between the SE program and employers to intervene quickly when problems arise.
Separation from Supported Employment (SE) SE is an evidence-based employment practice that has been shown effective across multiple disability groups. Studying job separations can provide valuable information for improving service. Locating the best person-job fit, as well as frequent contract with employers, can help prevent unnecessary job loss.
本研究的目的是调查支持性就业(SE)中的工作离职情况。目标是确定离职的类型、性质以及导致离职的突发情况。
采用回顾性病历审查方法。该研究由美国东南部一个大都市地区的大学支持性就业项目开展。参与者为47名接受支持性就业服务的客户,他们共获得67份工作并已离职。使用编码表记录有关离职类型及离职前问题的信息。数据通过描述性统计进行汇总。
离职人数最多的原因是解雇,其次是辞职以及雇主与雇员双方同意。导致离职的问题平均数量为2.2个,范围从1个到5个。仅发现8个积极问题(相比之下,消极问题有116个,中性问题有20个),最常见的积极问题是进入教育或培训项目。常见的消极问题包括工作表现不佳、出勤和守时问题、与主管的冲突以及社交和行为问题。
本研究结果表明,在工作开发过程中需要解决工作保留问题,为每位客户找到最合适的人岗匹配度和工作场所文化。研究结果还支持支持性就业项目与雇主之间需要保持警惕并定期沟通,以便在问题出现时迅速进行干预。
支持性就业(SE)中的离职 支持性就业是一种基于证据的就业实践,已被证明对多个残疾群体有效。研究工作离职情况可为改善服务提供有价值的信息。找到最佳的人岗匹配度以及与雇主频繁沟通,有助于防止不必要的失业。