Panagioti Maria, Richardson Gerry, Small Nicola, Murray Elizabeth, Rogers Anne, Kennedy Anne, Newman Stanton, Bower Peter
School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 27;14:356. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-356.
There is increasing interest in the role of 'self-management' interventions to support the management of long-term conditions in health service settings. Self-management may include patient education, support for decision-making, self-monitoring and psychological and social support. Self-management support has potential to improve the efficiency of health services by reducing other forms of utilisation (such as primary care or hospital use), but a shift to self-management may lead to negative outcomes, such as patients who feel more anxious about their health, are less able to cope, or who receive worse quality of care, all of which may impact on their health and quality of life. We sought to determine which models of self-management support are associated with significant reductions in health services utilisation without compromising outcomes among patients with long-term conditions.
We used systematic review with meta-analysis. We included randomised controlled trials in patients with long-term conditions which included self-management support interventions and reported measures of service utilisation or costs, as well as measures of health outcomes (standardized disease specific quality of life, generic quality of life, or depression/anxiety).We searched multiple databases (CENTRAL, CINAHL, Econlit, EMBASE, HEED, MEDLINE, NHS EED and PsycINFO) and the reference lists of published reviews. We calculated effects sizes for both outcomes and costs, and presented the results in permutation plots, as well as conventional meta-analyses.
We included 184 studies. Self-management support was associated with small but significant improvements in health outcomes, with the best evidence of effectiveness in patients with diabetic, respiratory, cardiovascular and mental health conditions. Only a minority of self-management support interventions reported reductions in health care utilisation in association with decrements in health. Evidence for reductions in utilisation associated with self-management support was strongest in respiratory and cardiovascular problems. Studies at higher risk of bias were more likely to report benefits.
Self-management support interventions can reduce health service utilization without compromising patient health outcomes, although effects were generally small, and the evidence was strongest in respiratory and cardiovascular disorders. Further work is needed to determine which components of self-management support are most effective.
在卫生服务环境中,“自我管理”干预措施在支持长期疾病管理方面所起的作用越来越受到关注。自我管理可能包括患者教育、决策支持、自我监测以及心理和社会支持。自我管理支持有潜力通过减少其他形式的医疗服务利用(如初级保健或住院治疗)来提高卫生服务效率,但转向自我管理可能会导致负面结果,比如患者对自身健康更加焦虑、应对能力下降或接受的护理质量变差,所有这些都可能影响他们的健康和生活质量。我们试图确定哪些自我管理支持模式与大幅减少卫生服务利用相关,同时又不影响长期疾病患者的治疗效果。
我们采用系统评价和荟萃分析。我们纳入了针对长期疾病患者的随机对照试验,这些试验包括自我管理支持干预措施,并报告了服务利用或成本的测量指标,以及健康结果的测量指标(标准化的特定疾病生活质量、一般生活质量或抑郁/焦虑)。我们检索了多个数据库(Cochrane系统评价数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、经济文献数据库、医学与健康领域数据库、卫生经济评价数据库、医学期刊数据库、英国国家卫生服务经济评价数据库和心理学文摘数据库)以及已发表综述的参考文献列表。我们计算了结果和成本的效应量,并以排列图以及传统荟萃分析的形式呈现结果。
我们纳入了184项研究。自我管理支持与健康结果的小幅但显著改善相关,在糖尿病、呼吸系统、心血管和心理健康疾病患者中,有效性证据最为充分。只有少数自我管理支持干预措施报告称,随着健康状况的改善,卫生保健利用有所减少。与自我管理支持相关的利用减少证据在呼吸系统和心血管问题中最为有力。存在较高偏倚风险的研究更有可能报告有益效果。
自我管理支持干预措施可以在不影响患者健康结果的情况下减少卫生服务利用,尽管效果通常较小,且在呼吸系统和心血管疾病方面的证据最为有力。需要进一步开展工作来确定自我管理支持的哪些组成部分最为有效。