Concordia University, Canada; Simon Fraser University, Canada
Concordia University, Canada; Simon Fraser University, Canada.
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Feb;25(2):252-61. doi: 10.1177/0963662514545014. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
The importance of evaluating deliberative public engagement events is well recognized, but such activities are rarely conducted for a variety of theoretical, political and practical reasons. In this article, we provide an assessment of the criteria presented in the 2008 National Research Council report on Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making (NRC report) as explicit indicators of quality for the 2012 'Advanced Biofuels' deliberative democracy event. The National Research Council's criteria were selected to evaluate this event because they are decision oriented, are the products of an exhaustive review of similar past events, are intended specifically for environmental processes and encompass many of the criteria presented in other evaluation frameworks. It is our hope that the results of our study may encourage others to employ and assess the National Research Council's criteria as a generalizable benchmark that may justifiably be used in forthcoming deliberative events exploring different topics with different audiences.
评估审议性公众参与活动的重要性已得到广泛认可,但由于各种理论、政治和实际原因,此类活动很少进行。在本文中,我们根据 2008 年美国国家研究委员会(NRC)关于公众参与环境评估和决策的报告(NRC 报告)中的标准,对 2012 年“先进生物燃料”审议民主活动进行了评估。选择 NRC 的标准来评估该活动,是因为这些标准具有决策导向性,是对类似过往活动进行详尽审查的产物,专门针对环境流程,并包含其他评估框架中提出的许多标准。我们希望本研究的结果能够鼓励其他人采用和评估 NRC 的标准,将其作为一种可推广的基准,可合理地用于即将举行的审议活动,以探索不同主题和不同受众。