Suppr超能文献

评估加拿大关于先进生物燃料生产和开发的审议民主小型公共活动的质量。

Assessing the quality of a deliberative democracy mini-public event about advanced biofuel production and development in Canada.

机构信息

Concordia University, Canada; Simon Fraser University, Canada

Concordia University, Canada; Simon Fraser University, Canada.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2016 Feb;25(2):252-61. doi: 10.1177/0963662514545014. Epub 2014 Aug 26.

Abstract

The importance of evaluating deliberative public engagement events is well recognized, but such activities are rarely conducted for a variety of theoretical, political and practical reasons. In this article, we provide an assessment of the criteria presented in the 2008 National Research Council report on Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making (NRC report) as explicit indicators of quality for the 2012 'Advanced Biofuels' deliberative democracy event. The National Research Council's criteria were selected to evaluate this event because they are decision oriented, are the products of an exhaustive review of similar past events, are intended specifically for environmental processes and encompass many of the criteria presented in other evaluation frameworks. It is our hope that the results of our study may encourage others to employ and assess the National Research Council's criteria as a generalizable benchmark that may justifiably be used in forthcoming deliberative events exploring different topics with different audiences.

摘要

评估审议性公众参与活动的重要性已得到广泛认可,但由于各种理论、政治和实际原因,此类活动很少进行。在本文中,我们根据 2008 年美国国家研究委员会(NRC)关于公众参与环境评估和决策的报告(NRC 报告)中的标准,对 2012 年“先进生物燃料”审议民主活动进行了评估。选择 NRC 的标准来评估该活动,是因为这些标准具有决策导向性,是对类似过往活动进行详尽审查的产物,专门针对环境流程,并包含其他评估框架中提出的许多标准。我们希望本研究的结果能够鼓励其他人采用和评估 NRC 的标准,将其作为一种可推广的基准,可合理地用于即将举行的审议活动,以探索不同主题和不同受众。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验