Collisson Beverly Anne, Grela Bernard, Spaulding Tammie, Rueckl Jay G, Magnuson James S
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.
Dev Sci. 2015 May;18(3):373-88. doi: 10.1111/desc.12219. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
We investigated whether preschool children with specific language impairment (SLI) exhibit the shape bias in word learning: the bias to generalize based on shape rather than size, color, or texture in an object naming context ('This is a wek; find another wek') but not in a non-naming similarity classification context ('See this? Which one goes with this one?'). Fifty-four preschool children (16 with SLI, 16 children with typical language [TL] in an equated control group, and 22 additional children with TL included in individual differences analyses but not group comparisons) completed a battery of linguistic and cognitive assessments and two experiments. In Experiment 1, children made generalization choices in object naming and similarity classification contexts on separate days, from options similar to a target object in shape, color, or texture. On average, TL children exhibited the shape bias in an object naming context, but children with SLI did not. In Experiment 2, we tested whether the failure to exhibit the shape bias might be linked to ability to detect systematicities in the visual domain. Experiment 2 supported this hypothesis, in that children with SLI failed to learn simple paired visual associations that were readily learned by children with TL. Analyses of individual differences in the two studies revealed that visual paired-associate learning predicted degree of shape bias in children with SLI and TL better than any other measure of nonverbal intelligence or standard assessments of language ability. We discuss theoretical and clinical implications.
我们调查了患有特定语言障碍(SLI)的学龄前儿童在词汇学习中是否表现出形状偏好:即在物体命名情境中(“这是一个wek;找出另一个wek”)基于形状而非大小、颜色或质地进行概括的偏好,但在非命名相似性分类情境中(“看到这个了吗?哪个与这个搭配?”)则不然。54名学龄前儿童(16名患有SLI,16名在配对对照组中具有典型语言能力[TL]的儿童,以及22名额外具有TL的儿童纳入个体差异分析但未纳入组间比较)完成了一系列语言和认知评估以及两项实验。在实验1中,儿童在不同日期分别在物体命名和相似性分类情境中做出概括选择,选项在形状、颜色或质地上与目标物体相似。平均而言,TL儿童在物体命名情境中表现出形状偏好,但患有SLI的儿童则没有。在实验2中,我们测试了未能表现出形状偏好是否可能与在视觉领域检测系统性的能力有关。实验2支持了这一假设,即患有SLI的儿童未能学会简单的配对视觉关联,而TL儿童很容易学会。两项研究中的个体差异分析表明,视觉配对联想学习比任何其他非语言智力测量或语言能力标准评估更能预测患有SLI和TL的儿童的形状偏好程度。我们讨论了理论和临床意义。