Mackeen A Dhanya, Walker LaToya, Ruhstaller Kelly, Schuster Meike, Sciscione Anthony
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Geisinger Health System in Danville, Pennsylvania (Drs Mackeen and Schuster); Novant Health in Charlotte, North Carolina (Dr Walker); the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia (Dr Ruhstaller); and Christiana Care Health System in Newark, Delaware (Dr Sciscione)
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Geisinger Health System in Danville, Pennsylvania (Drs Mackeen and Schuster); Novant Health in Charlotte, North Carolina (Dr Walker); the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia (Dr Ruhstaller); and Christiana Care Health System in Newark, Delaware (Dr Sciscione).
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Sep;114(9):686-92. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.137.
Although studies support the efficacy of the Foley catheter (FC) as a cervical ripening agent in pregnant women at term with intact membranes, its efficacy has not been well studied in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM).
To compare the interval to delivery in women with PROM who underwent induction of labor and cervical ripening with mechanical (FC) vs nonmechanical (prostaglandin [PG]) cervical ripening agents.
Retrospective medical record review at 2 hospitals of pregnant women who delivered between January 2009 and April 2011.
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Christiana Care Health System in Newark, Delaware.
Pregnant women with singleton gestations 36 weeks or greater who presented with PROM.
Cervical ripening with FC or PG.
The primary outcome was time from induction until delivery. Secondary outcomes included epidural use, maximum temperature during labor, number of vaginal examinations, occurrence of tachysystole, oxytocin dose, delivery mode, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal Apgar score.
Of 155 medical records of patients who met the inclusion criteria, 33 women underwent cervical ripening with PG (ie, misoprostol) and 122 with FC. The interval to delivery was almost halved in women who underwent cervical ripening with FC compared with misoprostol (736 vs 1354 minutes; P<.01). Compared with the women in the misoprostol group, those in the FC group received a statistically significant higher dose of oxytocin (P<.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to the remaining secondary outcomes. Of note, all of the women who received FC were from Christiana Care Health System, and all women who received misoprostol were from Thomas Jefferson University Hospital.
Foley catheters may help shorten the interval to delivery in women who are candidates for cervical ripening after PROM at or near term. There does not appear to be an increased risk for cesarean delivery or chorioamnionitis in those treated with FC.
尽管有研究支持Foley导管(FC)作为足月胎膜完整孕妇宫颈成熟剂的有效性,但在胎膜早破(PROM)的女性中其有效性尚未得到充分研究。
比较接受引产和宫颈成熟的PROM女性使用机械性(FC)与非机械性(前列腺素[PG])宫颈成熟剂至分娩的时间间隔。
对2家医院2009年1月至2011年4月分娩的孕妇进行回顾性病历审查。
宾夕法尼亚州费城的托马斯·杰斐逊大学医院和特拉华州纽瓦克的克里斯蒂安娜护理健康系统。
孕周36周及以上的单胎妊娠且出现PROM的孕妇。
使用FC或PG进行宫颈成熟。
主要结局是从引产到分娩的时间。次要结局包括硬膜外麻醉的使用、分娩期间的最高体温、阴道检查次数、宫缩过速的发生、催产素剂量、分娩方式、绒毛膜羊膜炎和新生儿阿氏评分。
在符合纳入标准的155例患者的病历中,33例女性使用PG(即米索前列醇)进行宫颈成熟,122例使用FC。与米索前列醇相比,使用FC进行宫颈成熟的女性至分娩的时间间隔几乎减半(736分钟对1354分钟;P<0.01)。与米索前列醇组的女性相比,FC组的女性接受的催产素剂量在统计学上显著更高(P<0.01)。在其余次要结局方面,两组之间无统计学显著差异。值得注意的是,所有接受FC的女性均来自克里斯蒂安娜护理健康系统,所有接受米索前列醇的女性均来自托马斯·杰斐逊大学医院。
Foley导管可能有助于缩短足月或接近足月PROM后宫颈成熟的女性至分娩的时间间隔。接受FC治疗的患者剖宫产或绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险似乎并未增加。