Perez-Cruzado David, González-Sánchez Manuel, Cuesta-Vargas Antonio Ignacio
Departamento de Psiquiatria y Fisioterapia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
Biomed Eng Online. 2014 Aug 30;13:127. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-127.
There are no published studies on the parameterisation and reliability of the single-leg stance (SLS) test with inertial sensors in stroke patients. Purpose: to analyse the reliability (intra-observer/inter-observer) and sensitivity of inertial sensors used for the SLS test in stroke patients. Secondary objective: to compare the records of the two inertial sensors (trunk and lumbar) to detect any significant differences in the kinematic data obtained in the SLS test.
Design: cross-sectional study. While performing the SLS test, two inertial sensors were placed at lumbar (L5-S1) and trunk regions (T7-T8). Setting: Laboratory of Biomechanics (Health Science Faculty - University of Málaga). Participants: Four chronic stroke survivors (over 65 yrs old). Measurement: displacement and velocity, Rotation (X-axis), Flexion/Extension (Y-axis), Inclination (Z-axis); Resultant displacement and velocity (V): RV = √Vx2+Vy2+Vz2. Along with SLS kinematic variables, descriptive analyses, differences between sensors locations and intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were also calculated.
Differences between the sensors were significant only for left inclination velocity (p = 0.036) and extension displacement in the non-affected leg with eyes open (p = 0.038). Intra-observer reliability of the trunk sensor ranged from 0.889-0.921 for the displacement and 0.849-0.892 for velocity. Intra-observer reliability of the lumbar sensor was between 0.896-0.949 for the displacement and 0.873-0.894 for velocity. Inter-observer reliability of the trunk sensor was between 0.878-0.917 for the displacement and 0.847-0.884 for velocity. Inter-observer reliability of the lumbar sensor ranged from 0.870-0.940 for the displacement and 0.863-0.884 for velocity.
There were no significant differences between the kinematic records made by an inertial sensor during the development of the SLS testing between two inertial sensors placed in the lumbar and thoracic regions. In addition, inertial sensors. Have the potential to be reliable, valid and sensitive instruments for kinematic measurements during SLS testing but further research is needed.
目前尚无关于中风患者使用惯性传感器进行单腿站立(SLS)测试的参数化和可靠性的已发表研究。目的:分析用于中风患者SLS测试的惯性传感器的可靠性(观察者内/观察者间)和敏感性。次要目标:比较两个惯性传感器(躯干和腰部)的记录,以检测在SLS测试中获得的运动学数据的任何显著差异。
设计:横断面研究。在进行SLS测试时,将两个惯性传感器放置在腰部(L5-S1)和躯干区域(T7-T8)。地点:生物力学实验室(马拉加大学健康科学学院)。参与者:四名慢性中风幸存者(65岁以上)。测量:位移和速度、旋转(X轴)、屈伸(Y轴)、倾斜(Z轴);合成位移和速度(V):RV = √Vx2+Vy2+Vz2。除了SLS运动学变量外,还计算了描述性分析、传感器位置之间的差异以及观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。
仅在非患侧腿睁眼时的左倾斜速度(p = 0.036)和伸展位移(p = 0.038)方面,传感器之间存在显著差异。躯干传感器的观察者内可靠性在位移方面为0.889 - 0.921,在速度方面为0.849 - 0.892。腰部传感器的观察者内可靠性在位移方面为0.896 - 0.949,在速度方面为0.873 - 0.894。躯干传感器的观察者间可靠性在位移方面为0.878 - 0.917,在速度方面为0.847 - 0.884。腰部传感器的观察者间可靠性在位移方面为0.870 - 0.940,在速度方面为0.863 - 0.884。
在腰部和胸部区域放置的两个惯性传感器进行SLS测试过程中,惯性传感器所记录的运动学数据之间没有显著差异。此外,惯性传感器有可能成为SLS测试期间运动学测量的可靠、有效和敏感工具,但还需要进一步研究。