Bazzano Lydia A, Hu Tian, Reynolds Kristi, Yao Lu, Bunol Calynn, Liu Yanxi, Chen Chung-Shiuan, Klag Michael J, Whelton Paul K, He Jiang
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 2;161(5):309-18. doi: 10.7326/M14-0180.
Low-carbohydrate diets are popular for weight loss, but their cardiovascular effects have not been well-studied, particularly in diverse populations.
To examine the effects of a low-carbohydrate diet compared with a low-fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors.
A randomized, parallel-group trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00609271).
A large academic medical center.
148 men and women without clinical cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
A low-carbohydrate (<40 g/d) or low-fat (<30% of daily energy intake from total fat [<7% saturated fat]) diet. Both groups received dietary counseling at regular intervals throughout the trial.
Data on weight, cardiovascular risk factors, and dietary composition were collected at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Sixty participants (82%) in the low-fat group and 59 (79%) in the low-carbohydrate group completed the intervention. At 12 months, participants on the low-carbohydrate diet had greater decreases in weight (mean difference in change, -3.5 kg [95% CI, -5.6 to -1.4 kg]; P = 0.002), fat mass (mean difference in change, -1.5% [CI, -2.6% to -0.4%]; P = 0.011), ratio of total-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mean difference in change, -0.44 [CI, -0.71 to -0.16]; P = 0.002), and triglyceride level (mean difference in change, -0.16 mmol/L [-14.1 mg/dL] [CI, -0.31 to -0.01 mmol/L {-27.4 to -0.8 mg/dL}]; P = 0.038) and greater increases in HDL cholesterol level (mean difference in change, 0.18 mmol/L [7.0 mg/dL] [CI, 0.08 to 0.28 mmol/L {3.0 to 11.0 mg/dL}]; P < 0.001) than those on the low-fat diet.
Lack of clinical cardiovascular disease end points.
The low-carbohydrate diet was more effective for weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor reduction than the low-fat diet. Restricting carbohydrate may be an option for persons seeking to lose weight and reduce cardiovascular risk factors.
National Institutes of Health.
低碳水化合物饮食在减肥方面很受欢迎,但其对心血管的影响尚未得到充分研究,尤其是在不同人群中。
比较低碳水化合物饮食与低脂饮食对体重和心血管危险因素的影响。
一项随机平行组试验。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00609271)。
一家大型学术医疗中心。
148名无临床心血管疾病和糖尿病的男性和女性。
低碳水化合物(<40克/天)或低脂(总脂肪每日能量摄入量<30%[饱和脂肪<7%])饮食。在整个试验过程中,两组均定期接受饮食咨询。
在0、3、6和12个月时收集体重、心血管危险因素和饮食组成的数据。
低脂组60名参与者(82%)和低碳水化合物组59名参与者(79%)完成了干预。在12个月时,低碳水化合物饮食组参与者的体重下降幅度更大(变化的平均差异为-3.5千克[95%CI,-5.6至-1.4千克];P = 0.002),脂肪量下降幅度更大(变化的平均差异为-1.5%[CI,-2.6%至-0.4%];P = 0.011),总高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇比值下降幅度更大(变化的平均差异为-0.44[CI,-0.71至-0.16];P = 0.002),甘油三酯水平下降幅度更大(变化的平均差异为-0.16毫摩尔/升[-14.1毫克/分升][CI,-0.31至-0.01毫摩尔/升{-27.4至-0.8毫克/分升}];P = 0.038),HDL胆固醇水平升高幅度更大(变化的平均差异为0.18毫摩尔/升[7.0毫克/分升][CI,0.08至0.28毫摩尔/升{3.0至11.0毫克/分升}];P < 0.001),高于低脂饮食组。
缺乏临床心血管疾病终点指标。
低碳水化合物饮食在减肥和降低心血管危险因素方面比低脂饮食更有效。限制碳水化合物摄入可能是寻求减肥和降低心血管危险因素的人的一种选择。
美国国立卫生研究院。