Fisher Marisa H, Mello Maria P, Dykens Elisabeth M
Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University, United States.
Department of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, United States.
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Dec;35(12):3276-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Aug 31.
Given the reliance on self-report in studies of adults with intellectual disabilities, this study examined individual vs. parental reports concerning the social approach behaviors of adults with Williams syndrome (WS) across a hypothetical and a live behavioral setting. Individuals with WS (N = 30) were asked whether they would approach strangers in two hypothetical, laboratory tasks (yes/no questionnaire vs. judging facial stimuli of individuals with different emotional expressions). Similarly, their parents also responded to a rating scale of their child's social approach behavior toward strangers displaying various emotions. Then, in a community setting, behavioral coders recorded actual social approaches of individuals with WS toward strangers. Although self-report ratings were consistent across measures, these measures did not correspond to the individuals' actual behaviors during the community observations. Conversely, parental reports did not correspond to their child's self-report measures, but parents did more accurately predict their child's real-life social approach behaviors. Implications are discussed for both research and practice.
鉴于在对成年智障人士的研究中依赖自我报告,本研究考察了在假设情境和实际行为情境下,关于威廉姆斯综合征(WS)成年患者社交接近行为的个人报告与父母报告之间的差异。研究询问了30名WS患者在两项假设性实验室任务中是否会接近陌生人(是/否问卷,以及判断不同情绪表情的个体面部刺激)。同样,他们的父母也对孩子对表现出各种情绪的陌生人的社交接近行为进行了评分。然后,在社区环境中,行为编码员记录了WS患者对陌生人的实际社交接近行为。虽然自我报告评分在各项测量中是一致的,但这些测量结果与社区观察期间个体的实际行为并不相符。相反,父母的报告与孩子的自我报告测量结果不相符,但父母能更准确地预测孩子在现实生活中的社交接近行为。本文讨论了研究和实践方面的意义。