Schmauss Daniel, Finck Tom, Liodaki Eirini, Stang Felix, Megerle Kai, Machens Hans-Guenther, Lohmeyer Joern Andreas
Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014 Oct;30(8):561-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375237. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
Long-term follow-up data of digital nerve reconstructions with nerve conduits are limited. Furthermore, it is not known whether nerve regeneration after tubulization is terminated after 12 months, or whether improvement can be expected after this period of time. Therefore, we present the long-term follow-up of two prospective clinical trials.
We invited 45 patients who were enrolled in two prospective clinical trials for long-term follow-up. All patients underwent digital nerve reconstruction with conduits made from bovine collagen I due to a gap length of < 26 mm. Sensibility was assessed using static and moving two-point discrimination and monofilament testing. Follow-up data of 1 week, 3, 6, and 12 months, and the current examination were available. Improvement of sensibility was investigated by comparison of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand classification score at 12-month follow-up with the score raised at current examination.
We examined 20 reconstructed nerves in 16 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.1 months (range, 29.3-93.3 months). We found an improved sensibility at current follow-up compared with the 12-month follow-up in 13 cases. Three cases had the same values whereas four cases had worsened sensibility. Improvement of sensibility was associated with a significantly shorter nerve gap length with significantly better results if the gap length was < 10 mm.
Our results provide evidence that the long-term recovery of sensibility after digital nerve tubulization depends on the nerve gap length with better results in those < 10 mm. Nerve regeneration after tubulization seems not to be terminated after 12 months.
使用神经导管进行指神经重建的长期随访数据有限。此外,尚不清楚管状化后的神经再生在12个月后是否终止,或者在此时间段之后是否有望改善。因此,我们展示了两项前瞻性临床试验的长期随访结果。
我们邀请了45名参与两项前瞻性临床试验的患者进行长期随访。所有患者因神经缺损长度<26mm,均接受了用I型牛胶原蛋白制成的导管进行指神经重建。使用静态和动态两点辨别觉及单丝测试评估感觉功能。有1周、3个月、6个月和12个月的随访数据以及当前检查结果。通过比较12个月随访时的美国手外科协会分类评分与当前检查时提高后的评分,研究感觉功能的改善情况。
我们检查了16例患者的20条重建神经,平均随访时间为58.1个月(范围29.3 - 93.3个月)。我们发现,与12个月随访相比,在当前随访中有13例感觉功能有所改善。3例结果相同,4例感觉功能恶化。感觉功能的改善与神经缺损长度显著缩短相关,如果缺损长度<10mm,结果会明显更好。
我们的结果表明,指神经管状化后感觉功能的长期恢复取决于神经缺损长度,缺损长度<10mm的患者效果更好。管状化后的神经再生在12个月后似乎并未终止。