Suppr超能文献

颈内动脉夹层血管内治疗的系统评价

A systematic review of endovascular management of internal carotid artery dissections.

作者信息

Xianjun Huang, Zhiming Zhou

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.

出版信息

Interv Neurol. 2013 Sep;1(3-4):164-70. doi: 10.1159/000353124.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We conducted a review of the safety and outcomes of endovascular intervention in patients with internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD).

SUMMARY

A literature review was performed. PubMed and Medline databases were searched from inception to September 2012 with the key words 'carotid artery' (title), 'dissection' (title) and 'endovascular' (title/abstract). All studies were included which reported outcomes of endovascular intervention in ICAD and provided information about technical and clinical results. After screening, we included 23 articles. In total, 201 patients (128 male and 73 female) were included in the eligible studies. The mean age was 46.7 years (range 13-83 years). Of the 201 patients, the causes of the carotid dissections were traumatic in 69 (34.3%), spontaneous in 115 (57.2%) and iatrogenic in 17 (8.5%). The technical success rate was 99.1%. The overall rate of major cardiovascular events in the perioperative period was 4%. No procedure-related deaths occurred. Imaging follow-up data (mean follow-up time 16.5 months) demonstrated that only 3.3% of patients had intimal hyperplasia or in-stent restenosis or occlusion of a treated vessel. Clinical follow-up data (mean follow-up period 20.9 months) showed that only 2.1% of patients had a recurrent transient ischemic attack in the territory of the treated vessel.

KEY MESSAGES

Endovascular intervention with stenting or stent-graft-supported angioplasty in selected patients with ICAD is promising. However, further evaluation is warranted to provide more evidence to support the feasibility of endovascular procedures in treating ICAD.

摘要

背景

我们对颈内动脉夹层(ICAD)患者血管内介入治疗的安全性和结局进行了一项综述。

总结

进行了文献综述。从创刊至2012年9月,检索了PubMed和Medline数据库,关键词为“颈动脉”(标题)、“夹层”(标题)和“血管内”(标题/摘要)。纳入所有报告ICAD血管内介入治疗结局并提供技术和临床结果信息的研究。筛选后,我们纳入了23篇文章。符合条件的研究共纳入201例患者(128例男性和73例女性)。平均年龄为46.7岁(范围13 - 83岁)。在这201例患者中,颈动脉夹层的病因有创伤性的69例(34.3%)、自发性的115例(57.2%)和医源性的17例(8.5%)。技术成功率为99.1%。围手术期主要心血管事件的总体发生率为4%。未发生与手术相关的死亡。影像学随访数据(平均随访时间16.5个月)显示,仅3.3%的患者出现内膜增生、支架内再狭窄或治疗血管闭塞。临床随访数据(平均随访期20.9个月)显示,仅2.1%的患者在治疗血管区域出现复发性短暂性脑缺血发作。

关键信息

对选定的ICAD患者进行支架置入或支架移植物支撑血管成形术的血管内介入治疗前景良好。然而,有必要进行进一步评估,以提供更多证据支持血管内手术治疗ICAD的可行性。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of endovascular management of internal carotid artery dissections.
Interv Neurol. 2013 Sep;1(3-4):164-70. doi: 10.1159/000353124.
2
Endovascular reconstruction of extracranial traumatic internal carotid artery dissections: a systematic review.
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Jun;43(3):931-940. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01092-6. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
Endovascular stenting of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissections: a systematic review of the literature.
Neurosurgery. 2011 Apr;68(4):856-66; discussion 866. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209ce03.
4
Endovascular repair of extracranial carotid artery dissection: current status and level of evidence.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Dec;19(12):1693-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
5
Stroke prevention by endovascular treatment of carotid and vertebral artery dissections.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Oct;9(10):952-957. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012565. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
Endovascular Treatment of Spontaneous Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Proximal Embolic Protection Device.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:667.e9-667.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.12.019. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
7
Endovascular reconstruction for progressively worsening carotid artery dissection.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jan;7(1):32-9. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010864. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
8
Stenting for peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(18):1-88. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
10
Endovascular treatment of acute internal carotid artery dissections: technical considerations, clinical and angiographic outcome.
Neuroradiology. 2016 Dec;58(12):1167-1179. doi: 10.1007/s00234-016-1757-z. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

2
Eagle syndrome: An updated review.
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Nov 3;14:389. doi: 10.25259/SNI_666_2023. eCollection 2023.
3
[Endovascular Treatment for Head and Neck Trauma].
J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023 Jul;84(4):792-808. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2023.0034. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
4
Initial clinical experience with Xpert-Pro peripheral self-expanding stent system for internal carotid artery dissection: Two case reports.
J Interv Med. 2023 Apr 24;6(2):103-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2023.04.003. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Malignant ischemic stroke revealing a spontaneous carotid dissection in a young patient: Rare case report.
Radiol Case Rep. 2023 May 4;18(7):2407-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.04.022. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Internal carotid artery patency after mechanical thrombectomy for stroke due to occlusive dissection: Impact on outcome.
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar;8(1):199-207. doi: 10.1177/23969873221140649. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Oct 23;23(12):182. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01603-2.
10
Surgical and radiological interventions for treating symptomatic extracranial cervical artery dissection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 1;2(2):CD013118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013118.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-center experience on endovascular reconstruction of traumatic internal carotid artery dissections.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jan;72(1):216-21. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823f630a.
2
Feasibility and safety of stenting for symptomatic carotid arterial dissection.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32 Suppl 1:11-5. doi: 10.1159/000330315. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
3
Long-term outcomes of internal carotid artery dissection.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):370-4; discussion 375. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.02.059. Epub 2011 May 28.
4
Endovascular stent therapy for extracranial and intracranial carotid artery dissection: single-center experience.
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jul;115(1):91-100. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.JNS091806. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
6
Stent placement for the treatment of a symptomatic intracranial arterial dissection in an adolescent.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Aug;6(2):154-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.PEDS1081.
9
Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome.
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Jul;8(7):668-78. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70084-5.
10
Endovascular repair of extracranial carotid artery dissection: current status and level of evidence.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Dec;19(12):1693-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Oct 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验