Moon Karam, Albuquerque Felipe C, Ducruet Andrew F, Crowley R Webster, McDougall Cameron G
Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
J Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;121(5):1085-92. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132677. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
Intracranial aneurysms, especially those of the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA), can present with cranial nerve (CN) palsies. The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has demonstrated safety and efficacy in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms by flow diversion, but little data exist reporting the outcomes of cranial neuropathies following treatment with the device.
The prospectively maintained Barrow Neurological Institute's endovascular database was reviewed for all patients treated with the PED after presenting with one or more CN palsies secondary to a cerebral aneurysm since May 2011. Patient charts and digital subtraction angiograms were reviewed to report clinical and angiographic outcomes. Only patients with clinical follow-up were included in the analysis.
A total of 127 patients were treated with the PED at the authors' institution after FDA approval. Twentytwo patients presented with cranial neuropathies, for initial inclusion in this study. Of these, 20 had sufficient followup for analysis. Cranial neuropathies included those of CN II, III, V, and VI, with presenting symptoms of diplopia, decreased visual acuity, and facial numbness and/or pain. Thirteen lesions were cavernous segment ICA aneurysms, whereas the remainder included supraclinoid and petrous segment ICA, posterior communicating artery, and basilar trunk aneurysms. At an average clinical follow-up of 9.55 months, 15 patients (75%) had resolution or significant improvement of their cranial neuropathies, and the remaining 5 had stable symptoms. Of the 18 patients with angiographic follow-up, 12 (66.7%) demonstrated complete obliteration or small neck residual, whereas 6 (33.3%) had residual lesion. Patients with complete or near-complete obliteration of their lesion were significantly more likely to demonstrate symptomatic improvement at follow-up (p = 0.009). Two patients with persistent symptoms were eventually treated with microsurgical bypass. Transient complications in this series included 6 (30%) extracranial hemorrhagic complications related to dual-antiplatelet therapy, all of which were managed medically. There was 1 delayed right ICA occlusion following retreatment that led to microsurgical bypass.
Intracranial aneurysms presenting with one or more CN palsies show a high rate of clinical improvement after treatment with the PED. Clinical outcomes must be weighed against the risks and challenges faced with flow diverters. Further research is warranted for patients whose symptoms do not respond optimally to device placement.
颅内动脉瘤,尤其是颈内动脉海绵窦段的动脉瘤,可伴有脑神经麻痹。Pipeline栓塞装置(PED)已证明通过血流导向治疗脑动脉瘤具有安全性和有效性,但关于该装置治疗后颅神经病变结果的数据报道较少。
回顾自2011年5月以来在巴罗神经学研究所前瞻性维护的血管内数据库中,所有因脑动脉瘤继发一种或多种脑神经麻痹而接受PED治疗的患者。查阅患者病历和数字减影血管造影以报告临床和血管造影结果。分析仅纳入有临床随访的患者。
在FDA批准后,作者所在机构共有127例患者接受了PED治疗。22例患者出现颅神经病变,最初纳入本研究。其中,20例有足够的随访资料用于分析。颅神经病变包括第II、III、V和VI脑神经病变,表现为复视、视力下降、面部麻木和/或疼痛。13个病变为颈内动脉海绵窦段动脉瘤,其余包括颈内动脉床突上段和岩骨段、后交通动脉及基底动脉干动脉瘤。平均临床随访9.55个月时,15例患者(75%)的颅神经病变得到缓解或显著改善,其余5例症状稳定。在18例有血管造影随访的患者中,12例(66.7%)显示完全闭塞或颈部小残留,而6例(33.3%)有残留病变。病变完全或接近完全闭塞的患者在随访时症状改善的可能性显著更高(p = 0.009)。2例症状持续的患者最终接受了显微外科搭桥治疗。本系列中的短暂并发症包括6例(30%)与双联抗血小板治疗相关的颅外出血并发症,均经药物治疗。再次治疗后出现1例延迟性右侧颈内动脉闭塞,导致进行了显微外科搭桥。
伴有一种或多种脑神经麻痹的颅内动脉瘤在接受PED治疗后临床改善率较高。临床结果必须与血流导向装置面临的风险和挑战相权衡。对于症状对装置置入反应不佳的患者,有必要进行进一步研究。