Suppr超能文献

用于既往治疗过的动脉瘤复发的管道栓塞装置。

Pipeline embolization device for recurrence of previously treated aneurysms.

作者信息

Dornbos David, Karras Constantine L, Wenger Nicole, Priddy Blake, Youssef Patrick, Nimjee Shahid M, Powers Ciarán J

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1744.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The utilization of the Pipeline embolization device (PED) has increased significantly since its inception and original approval for use in large, broad-necked aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. While microsurgical clipping and advances in endovascular techniques have improved overall efficacy in achieving complete occlusion, recurrences still occur, and the best modality for retreatment remains controversial. Despite its efficacy in this setting, the role of PED utilization in the setting of recurrent aneurysms has not yet been well defined. This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of PED in the recurrence of previously treated aneurysms. METHODS The authors reviewed a total of 13 cases in which patients underwent secondary placement of a PED for aneurysm recurrence following prior treatment with another modality. The PEDs were used to treat aneurysm recurrence or residual following endovascular coiling in 7 cases, flow diversion in 2, and microsurgical clipping in 4. The mean time between initial treatment and retreatment with a PED was 28.1 months, 12 months, and 88.7 months, respectively. Clinical outcomes, including complications and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, and angiographic evidence of complete occlusion were tabulated for each treatment group. RESULTS All PEDs were successfully placed without periprocedural complications. The rate of complete occlusion was 80% at 6 months after PED placement and 100% at 12 months in these patients who underwent PED placement following failed endovascular coiling; there were no adverse clinical sequelae at a mean follow-up of 26.1 months. In the 2 cases in which PEDs were placed for treatment of residual aneurysms following prior flow diversion, 1 patient demonstrated asymptomatic vessel occlusion at 6 months, and the other exhibited complete aneurysm occlusion at 12 months. In patients with aneurysm recurrence following prior microsurgical clipping, the rate of complete occlusion was 100% at 6 and 12 months, with no adverse sequelae noted at a mean clinical follow-up of 27.7 months. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of recurrent aneurysms with the PED following previous endovascular coiling, flow diversion, or microsurgical clipping is associated with a high rate of complete occlusion and minimal morbidity.

摘要

目的 自Pipeline栓塞装置(PED)问世并最初获批用于治疗颈内动脉大型宽颈动脉瘤以来,其使用量显著增加。虽然显微外科夹闭术和血管内技术的进步提高了实现完全闭塞的总体疗效,但复发情况仍会出现,而再治疗的最佳方式仍存在争议。尽管PED在这种情况下有效,但其在复发性动脉瘤治疗中的作用尚未得到明确界定。本研究旨在评估PED治疗先前治疗过的动脉瘤复发的安全性和有效性。方法 作者回顾了总共13例患者,这些患者在先前采用其他方式治疗后因动脉瘤复发而接受了PED二次置入。7例患者使用PED治疗血管内栓塞术后的动脉瘤复发或残余,2例用于血流导向治疗,4例用于显微外科夹闭术后的复发。初次治疗与使用PED再治疗之间的平均时间分别为28.1个月、12个月和88.7个月。为每个治疗组列出临床结果,包括并发症和改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,以及完全闭塞的血管造影证据。结果 所有PED均成功置入,无围手术期并发症。在血管内栓塞术失败后接受PED置入的这些患者中,PED置入后6个月完全闭塞率为80%,12个月时为100%;平均随访26.1个月时无不良临床后遗症。在2例先前进行血流导向治疗后因残余动脉瘤而置入PED的患者中,1例患者在6个月时出现无症状血管闭塞,另1例在12个月时实现动脉瘤完全闭塞。在先前显微外科夹闭术后动脉瘤复发的患者中,6个月和12个月时完全闭塞率均为100%,平均临床随访27.7个月时未发现不良后遗症。结论 先前血管内栓塞术、血流导向治疗或显微外科夹闭术后使用PED治疗复发性动脉瘤,完全闭塞率高且发病率极低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验