全科医疗中急性下背痛的管理:不确定性与相互矛盾的确定性

Acute low back pain management in general practice: uncertainty and conflicting certainties.

作者信息

Darlow Ben, Dean Sarah, Perry Meredith, Mathieson Fiona, Baxter G David, Dowell Anthony

机构信息

Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South 6242, New Zealand,

Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter EX2 4SG, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2014 Dec;31(6):723-32. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu051. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is a significant health problem and common reason to visit the GP. Evidence suggests GPs experience difficulty applying evidence-based guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

Explore GPs' underlying beliefs about acute LBP and how these influence their clinical management of patients.

METHODS

Eleven GPs from one geographical region within New Zealand were recruited by purposive sampling. Audio recordings of semi-structured qualitative interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed with an Interpretive Description framework.

RESULTS

Four key themes emerged related to the causes of acute LBP, GP confidence, communicating diagnostic uncertainty and encouraging movement and activity. Acute LBP was seen as a direct representation of tissue injury, consequently the assessment and management of patients' attitudes and beliefs was not a priority. Participants' confidence was decreased due to a perceived inability to diagnose or influence the tissue injury. Despite this, diagnoses were provided to patients to provide reassurance and meet expectations. Guideline recommendations regarding activity conflicted with a perceived need to protect damaged tissue, resulting in reported provision of mixed messages about the need to be both active and careful.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs' initial focus upon tissue injury during acute care, and providing a diagnostic label, may influence patients' subsequent alignment with a biomedical perspective and contribute to consultation conflict and patients' perception of blame when discussion of psychosocial influences is introduced. Demonstrating the relevance of the biopsychosocial model to acute LBP may improve GPs' alignment with guidelines, improve their confidence to manage these patients and ultimately improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

腰痛是一个重大的健康问题,也是患者就诊全科医生的常见原因。有证据表明,全科医生在应用循证指南时存在困难。

目的

探究全科医生对急性腰痛的潜在信念,以及这些信念如何影响他们对患者的临床管理。

方法

通过目的抽样法,从新西兰一个地理区域招募了11名全科医生。对半结构化定性访谈的音频记录进行逐字转录。采用解释性描述框架对数据进行分析。

结果

出现了四个与急性腰痛病因、全科医生信心、传达诊断不确定性以及鼓励活动相关的关键主题。急性腰痛被视为组织损伤的直接表现,因此对患者态度和信念的评估与管理并非首要任务。由于感觉无法诊断或影响组织损伤,参与者的信心有所下降。尽管如此,仍向患者提供诊断以给予安慰并满足期望。关于活动的指南建议与保护受损组织的感知需求相冲突,导致在关于积极活动和谨慎行事的必要性方面传达了相互矛盾的说辞。

结论

全科医生在急性护理期间最初关注组织损伤并提供诊断标签,可能会影响患者随后与生物医学观点的契合度,并在引入心理社会影响的讨论时导致咨询冲突和患者的责备感。证明生物心理社会模型与急性腰痛的相关性,可能会提高全科医生与指南的契合度,增强他们管理这些患者的信心,并最终改善治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索