Weltermann Birgitta M, Doost Sahar Mousa, Kersting Christine, Gesenhues Stefan
Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany,
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2014 Oct;126(19-20):613-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-014-0590-9. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
Studies showed a positive association between appointment adherence and blood pressure control. In randomized-controlled trials blood pressure therapy was improved by recall systems. We analyze the effectiveness of an active telephone recall on blood pressure control for patients with low appointment adherence in regular primary care.
This retrospective cohort study analyses all hypertensive patients without any hypertension-related disease (primary prevention) of an academic teaching primary care practice using a structured hypertension management. Blood pressure levels at the beginning of the hypertension management and after 1 year were analyzed. Blood pressure control rates (< 140/90 mmHg) and average blood pressure of patients with good appointment adherence and those requiring a phone recall were compared.
A total of 410 hypertensive patients were identified. A telephone recall was required in 22 % (n = 92), which was successful in 87 % of patients (n = 80). At the beginning, 66 % of appointment adherent patients had controlled hypertension which increased to 81 % after 1 year. In patients not adhering to appointments the initial blood pressure control rate was 59 % and improved to 74 % after 1 year. Average blood pressure office readings decreased from 141/90 to 136/86 mmHg (p < 0.05) in those adhering to appointments, while it improved from 146/92 to 138/88 mmHg (p < 0.05) in those requiring recall.
Active telephone recall improved blood pressure control of hypertensive patients with low appointment adherence in regular primary care. An active recall can be recommended for other primary care scenarios.
研究表明预约依从性与血压控制之间存在正相关。在随机对照试验中,召回系统改善了血压治疗。我们分析了主动电话召回对常规初级保健中预约依从性低的患者血压控制的有效性。
这项回顾性队列研究分析了一家学术教学初级保健机构中所有无任何高血压相关疾病(一级预防)的高血压患者,采用结构化高血压管理。分析了高血压管理开始时和1年后的血压水平。比较了预约依从性好的患者和需要电话召回的患者的血压控制率(<140/90mmHg)和平均血压。
共识别出410例高血压患者。22%(n = 92)的患者需要电话召回,其中87%(n = 80)的召回成功。开始时,66%的预约依从性患者高血压得到控制,1年后这一比例增至81%。在未遵守预约的患者中,初始血压控制率为59%,1年后提高到74%。预约依从性好的患者诊室平均血压从141/90mmHg降至136/86mmHg(p < ),而需要召回的患者平均血压从146/92mmHg改善至138/88mmHg(p < )。
主动电话召回改善了常规初级保健中预约依从性低的高血压患者的血压控制。对于其他初级保健场景,可推荐采用主动召回。 0.05 0.05