General Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, 90 Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TB, UK.
School of Social & Political Sciences, Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, 27 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 10;22(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03456-2.
Although missed appointments in healthcare have been an area of concern for policy, practice and research, the primary focus has been on reducing single 'situational' missed appointments to the benefit of services. Little attention has been paid to the causes and consequences of more 'enduring' multiple missed appointments in primary care and the role this has in producing health inequalities.
We conducted a realist review of the literature on multiple missed appointments to identify the causes of 'missingness.' We searched multiple databases, carried out iterative citation-tracking on key papers on the topic of missed appointments and identified papers through searches of grey literature. We synthesised evidence from 197 papers, drawing on the theoretical frameworks of candidacy and fundamental causation.
Missingness is caused by an overlapping set of complex factors, including patients not identifying a need for an appointment or feeling it is 'for them'; appointments as sites of poor communication, power imbalance and relational threat; patients being exposed to competing demands, priorities and urgencies; issues of travel and mobility; and an absence of choice or flexibility in when, where and with whom appointments take place.
Interventions to address missingness at policy and practice levels should be theoretically informed, tailored to patients experiencing missingness and their identified needs and barriers; be cognisant of causal domains at multiple levels and address as many as practical; and be designed to increase safety for those seeking care.
尽管医疗保健中的失约问题一直是政策、实践和研究关注的焦点,但主要关注点一直是减少单一的“情境性”失约,以造福服务。对于初级保健中更“持久”的多次失约的原因和后果以及这对产生健康不平等的影响,关注较少。
我们对多次失约的文献进行了真实主义综述,以确定“失约”的原因。我们搜索了多个数据库,对失约主题的关键论文进行了迭代引用跟踪,并通过搜索灰色文献确定了论文。我们综合了 197 篇论文的证据,借鉴了候选和根本因果关系的理论框架。
失约是由一系列复杂因素共同导致的,包括患者没有意识到需要预约或觉得预约与自己无关;预约是沟通不畅、权力失衡和关系威胁的场所;患者面临竞争需求、优先事项和紧迫性;出行和流动性问题;以及在何时、何地以及与谁预约缺乏选择或灵活性。
在政策和实践层面上,针对失约问题的干预措施应该具有理论依据,针对经历失约和他们确定的需求和障碍进行量身定制;应该意识到多个层面的因果关系,并尽可能多地解决;并旨在为寻求护理的人增加安全性。