O'Donoghue Amie C, Williams Pamela A, Sullivan Helen W, Boudewyns Vanessa, Squire Claudia, Willoughby Jessica Fitts
Office of Prescription Drug Promotion, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, USA.
RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.039. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
Although pharmaceutical companies cannot make comparative claims in direct-to-consumer (DTC) ads for prescription drugs without substantial evidence, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration permits some comparisons based on labeled attributes of the drug, such as dosing. Researchers have examined comparative advertising for packaged goods; however, scant research has examined comparative DTC advertising. We conducted two studies to determine if comparative claims in DTC ads influence consumers' perceptions and recall of drug information. In Experiment 1, participants with osteoarthritis (n=1934) viewed a fictitious print or video DTC ad that had no comparative claim or made an efficacy comparison to a named or unnamed competitor. Participants who viewed print (but not video) ads with named competitors had greater efficacy and lower risk perceptions than participants who viewed unnamed competitor and noncomparative ads. In Experiment 2, participants with high cholesterol or high body mass index (n=5317) viewed a fictitious print or video DTC ad that had no comparative claim or made a comparison to a named or unnamed competitor. We varied the type of comparison (of indication, dosing, or mechanism of action) and whether the comparison was accompanied by a visual depiction. Participants who viewed print and video ads with named competitors had greater efficacy perceptions than participants who viewed unnamed competitor and noncomparative ads. Unlike Experiment 1, named competitors in print ads resulted in higher risk perceptions than unnamed competitors. In video ads, participants who saw an indication comparison had greater benefit recall than participants who saw dosing or mechanism of action comparisons. In addition, visual depictions of the comparison decreased risk recall for video ads. Overall, the results suggest that comparative claims in DTC ads could mislead consumers about a drug's efficacy and risk; therefore, caution should be used when presenting comparative claims in DTC ads.
尽管制药公司在没有充分证据的情况下不能在面向消费者的处方药直接面向消费者(DTC)广告中进行比较性宣称,但美国食品药品监督管理局允许基于药物的标签属性进行一些比较,比如给药方式。研究人员已经对包装商品的比较广告进行了研究;然而,很少有研究考察过DTC比较广告。我们进行了两项研究,以确定DTC广告中的比较性宣称是否会影响消费者对药物信息的认知和记忆。在实验1中,骨关节炎患者(n = 1934)观看了一则虚构的平面或视频DTC广告,该广告没有比较性宣称,或者与一个有名或无名的竞争对手进行了疗效比较。与观看无名竞争对手广告和非比较性广告的参与者相比,观看有有名竞争对手的平面(而非视频)广告的参与者有更高的疗效认知和更低的风险认知。在实验2中,高胆固醇或高体重指数的参与者(n = 5317)观看了一则虚构的平面或视频DTC广告,该广告没有比较性宣称,或者与一个有名或无名的竞争对手进行了比较。我们改变了比较的类型(适应症、给药方式或作用机制)以及比较是否伴有视觉呈现。与观看无名竞争对手广告和非比较性广告的参与者相比,观看有有名竞争对手的平面和视频广告的参与者有更高的疗效认知。与实验1不同的是,平面广告中的有名竞争对手导致的风险认知高于无名竞争对手。在视频广告中,观看适应症比较的参与者比观看给药方式或作用机制比较的参与者对益处的记忆更好。此外,比较的视觉呈现降低了视频广告的风险记忆。总体而言,结果表明DTC广告中的比较性宣称可能会在药物疗效和风险方面误导消费者;因此,在DTC广告中呈现比较性宣称时应谨慎。