Suppr超能文献

处方药面向消费者的直接广告中的比较性声明对消费者认知和记忆的影响。

Effects of comparative claims in prescription drug direct-to-consumer advertising on consumer perceptions and recall.

作者信息

O'Donoghue Amie C, Williams Pamela A, Sullivan Helen W, Boudewyns Vanessa, Squire Claudia, Willoughby Jessica Fitts

机构信息

Office of Prescription Drug Promotion, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, USA.

RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.039. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

Abstract

Although pharmaceutical companies cannot make comparative claims in direct-to-consumer (DTC) ads for prescription drugs without substantial evidence, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration permits some comparisons based on labeled attributes of the drug, such as dosing. Researchers have examined comparative advertising for packaged goods; however, scant research has examined comparative DTC advertising. We conducted two studies to determine if comparative claims in DTC ads influence consumers' perceptions and recall of drug information. In Experiment 1, participants with osteoarthritis (n=1934) viewed a fictitious print or video DTC ad that had no comparative claim or made an efficacy comparison to a named or unnamed competitor. Participants who viewed print (but not video) ads with named competitors had greater efficacy and lower risk perceptions than participants who viewed unnamed competitor and noncomparative ads. In Experiment 2, participants with high cholesterol or high body mass index (n=5317) viewed a fictitious print or video DTC ad that had no comparative claim or made a comparison to a named or unnamed competitor. We varied the type of comparison (of indication, dosing, or mechanism of action) and whether the comparison was accompanied by a visual depiction. Participants who viewed print and video ads with named competitors had greater efficacy perceptions than participants who viewed unnamed competitor and noncomparative ads. Unlike Experiment 1, named competitors in print ads resulted in higher risk perceptions than unnamed competitors. In video ads, participants who saw an indication comparison had greater benefit recall than participants who saw dosing or mechanism of action comparisons. In addition, visual depictions of the comparison decreased risk recall for video ads. Overall, the results suggest that comparative claims in DTC ads could mislead consumers about a drug's efficacy and risk; therefore, caution should be used when presenting comparative claims in DTC ads.

摘要

尽管制药公司在没有充分证据的情况下不能在面向消费者的处方药直接面向消费者(DTC)广告中进行比较性宣称,但美国食品药品监督管理局允许基于药物的标签属性进行一些比较,比如给药方式。研究人员已经对包装商品的比较广告进行了研究;然而,很少有研究考察过DTC比较广告。我们进行了两项研究,以确定DTC广告中的比较性宣称是否会影响消费者对药物信息的认知和记忆。在实验1中,骨关节炎患者(n = 1934)观看了一则虚构的平面或视频DTC广告,该广告没有比较性宣称,或者与一个有名或无名的竞争对手进行了疗效比较。与观看无名竞争对手广告和非比较性广告的参与者相比,观看有有名竞争对手的平面(而非视频)广告的参与者有更高的疗效认知和更低的风险认知。在实验2中,高胆固醇或高体重指数的参与者(n = 5317)观看了一则虚构的平面或视频DTC广告,该广告没有比较性宣称,或者与一个有名或无名的竞争对手进行了比较。我们改变了比较的类型(适应症、给药方式或作用机制)以及比较是否伴有视觉呈现。与观看无名竞争对手广告和非比较性广告的参与者相比,观看有有名竞争对手的平面和视频广告的参与者有更高的疗效认知。与实验1不同的是,平面广告中的有名竞争对手导致的风险认知高于无名竞争对手。在视频广告中,观看适应症比较的参与者比观看给药方式或作用机制比较的参与者对益处的记忆更好。此外,比较的视觉呈现降低了视频广告的风险记忆。总体而言,结果表明DTC广告中的比较性宣称可能会在药物疗效和风险方面误导消费者;因此,在DTC广告中呈现比较性宣称时应谨慎。

相似文献

5
Disease Information in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Print Ads.面向消费者的处方药印刷广告中的疾病信息。
J Health Commun. 2016;21(2):228-39. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1058440. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

4
Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms: two randomized trials.使用药品说明书传达药物的益处和危害:两项随机试验
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 21;150(8):516-27. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-8-200904210-00106. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
7
Capacity limits of information processing in the brain.大脑中信息处理的容量限制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jun;9(6):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.010.
8
The perfidy of percentiles.百分位数的不可靠性。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2002 Apr;17(3):295-303.
9
What very small numbers mean.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Sep;131(3):424-42. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.3.424.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验