Suppr超能文献

在面向消费者的处方药广告中呈现疗效信息。

Presenting efficacy information in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.

作者信息

O'Donoghue Amie C, Sullivan Helen W, Aikin Kathryn J, Chowdhury Dhuly, Moultrie Rebecca R, Rupert Douglas J

机构信息

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):271-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated whether presenting prescription drug efficacy information in direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising helps individuals accurately report a drug's benefits and, if so, which numerical format is most helpful.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled study of individuals diagnosed with high cholesterol (n=2807) who viewed fictitious prescription drug print or television ads containing either no drug efficacy information or efficacy information in one of five numerical formats. We measured drug efficacy recall, drug perceptions and attitudes, behavioral intentions, and drug risk recall.

RESULTS

Individuals who viewed absolute frequency and/or percentage information more accurately reported drug efficacy than participants who viewed no efficacy information. Participants who viewed relative frequency information generally reported drug efficacy less accurately than participants who viewed other numerical formats.

CONCLUSION

Adding efficacy information to DTC ads-both in print and on television-may potentially increase an individual's knowledge of a drug's efficacy, which may improve patient-provider communication and promote more informed decisions.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Providing quantitative efficacy information in a combination of formats (e.g., absolute frequency and percent) may help patients remember information and make decisions about prescription drugs.

摘要

目的

我们评估了在面向消费者的直接广告(DTC)中呈现处方药疗效信息是否有助于个人准确报告药物的益处,如果是,哪种数字格式最有帮助。

方法

我们对2807名被诊断为高胆固醇的个体进行了一项随机对照研究,这些个体观看了虚构的处方药平面广告或电视广告,广告中要么没有药物疗效信息,要么有五种数字格式之一的疗效信息。我们测量了药物疗效回忆、药物认知和态度、行为意图以及药物风险回忆。

结果

与未观看疗效信息的参与者相比,观看绝对频率和/或百分比信息的个体更准确地报告了药物疗效。观看相对频率信息的参与者通常比观看其他数字格式的参与者更不准确地报告药物疗效。

结论

在DTC广告(包括平面广告和电视广告)中添加疗效信息可能会增加个人对药物疗效的了解,这可能会改善患者与医疗服务提供者之间交流,并促进做出更明智的决定。

实践意义

以多种格式(例如绝对频率和百分比)提供定量疗效信息可能有助于患者记住信息并做出有关处方药的决定。

相似文献

1
Presenting efficacy information in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):271-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
2
Visual presentations of efficacy data in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print and television advertisements: A randomized study.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):790-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.015. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
3
Communicating efficacy information based on composite scores in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Apr;99(4):583-590. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
4
Effects of comparative claims in prescription drug direct-to-consumer advertising on consumer perceptions and recall.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.039. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
5
Correction of misleading information in prescription drug television advertising: The roles of advertisement similarity and time delay.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Mar-Apr;13(2):378-388. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
7
Disease Information in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Print Ads.
J Health Commun. 2016;21(2):228-39. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1058440. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
9
Visual images of prescription drug benefits in direct-to-consumer television advertisements.
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2240-2249. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
10
Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms: two randomized trials.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 21;150(8):516-27. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-8-200904210-00106. Epub 2009 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
How Difference Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 2: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241310242. doi: 10.1177/23814683241310242. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
2
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
3
Laypersons' understanding of statistical concepts commonly used in prescription drug promotion: A review of the research literature.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Dec;20(12 Pt A):1075-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.08.092. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
5
Assessing the Inclusion of Foil Items in a Scale to Measure Recognition of Health Messages.
Commun Methods Meas. 2021 Jul 3;15(3). doi: 10.1080/19312458.2020.1768520.
6
The FDA's Diverse and Dynamic Activities in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Advancing and Supporting Health Equity.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211004735. doi: 10.1177/21501327211004735.
7
Visual images of prescription drug benefits in direct-to-consumer television advertisements.
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2240-2249. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
8
Attention to and Distraction from Risk Information in Prescription Drug Advertising: An Eye Tracking Study.
J Public Policy Mark. 2017 Sep 1;36(2):236-245. doi: 10.1509/jppm.16.013.
9
Impact of direct-to-consumer drug advertising during the Super Bowl on drug utilization.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Aug;16(8):1136-1139. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.12.006. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Visual presentations of efficacy data in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print and television advertisements: A randomized study.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):790-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.015. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
2
Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):87-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00004.
3
Hidden in plain sight marketing prescription drugs to consumers in the twentieth century.
Am J Public Health. 2010 May;100(5):793-803. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.181255. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
4
Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1068-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.015. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
5
Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms: two randomized trials.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 21;150(8):516-27. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-8-200904210-00106. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
7
Making numbers matter: present and future research in risk communication.
Am J Health Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;31 Suppl 1:S47-56. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S47.
8
Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations.
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):696-713. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07307271. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
9
The drug facts box: providing consumers with simple tabular data on drug benefit and harm.
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):655-62. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306786. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验