• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向消费者的处方药印刷品和电视广告中疗效数据的视觉呈现:一项随机研究。

Visual presentations of efficacy data in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print and television advertisements: A randomized study.

作者信息

Sullivan Helen W, O'Donoghue Amie C, Aikin Kathryn J, Chowdhury Dhuly, Moultrie Rebecca R, Rupert Douglas J

机构信息

U.S Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

U.S Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):790-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.015. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.015
PMID:26749356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7285816/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether visual aids help people recall quantitative efficacy information in direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertisements, and if so, which types of visual aids are most helpful.

METHODS

Individuals diagnosed with high cholesterol (n=2504) were randomized to view a fictional DTC print or television advertisement with no visual aid or one of four visual aids (pie chart, bar chart, table, or pictograph) depicting drug efficacy. We measured drug efficacy and risk recall, drug perceptions and attitudes, and behavioral intentions.

RESULTS

For print advertisements, a bar chart or table, compared with no visual aid, elicited more accurate drug efficacy recall. The bar chart was better at this than the pictograph and the table was better than the pie chart. For television advertisements, any visual aid, compared with no visual aid, elicited more accurate drug efficacy recall. The bar chart was better at this than the pictograph or the table.

CONCLUSION

Visual aids depicting quantitative efficacy information in DTC print and television advertisements increased drug efficacy recall, which may help people make informed decisions about prescription drugs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Adding visual aids to DTC advertising may increase the public's knowledge of how well prescription drugs work.

摘要

目的

确定视觉辅助工具是否有助于人们回忆直接面向消费者(DTC)的处方药广告中的定量疗效信息,若有帮助,哪种类型的视觉辅助工具最有帮助。

方法

将被诊断为高胆固醇的个体(n = 2504)随机分组,观看一则虚构的无视觉辅助工具的DTC平面广告或电视广告,或观看四种描绘药物疗效的视觉辅助工具(饼图、柱状图、表格或象形图)之一的广告。我们测量了药物疗效和风险回忆、对药物的认知和态度以及行为意图。

结果

对于平面广告,与无视觉辅助工具相比,柱状图或表格能引发更准确的药物疗效回忆。柱状图在这方面比象形图更好,表格比饼图更好。对于电视广告,与无视觉辅助工具相比,任何视觉辅助工具都能引发更准确的药物疗效回忆。柱状图在这方面比象形图或表格更好。

结论

在DTC平面广告和电视广告中描绘定量疗效信息的视觉辅助工具提高了药物疗效回忆,这可能有助于人们对处方药做出明智的决策。

实践意义

在DTC广告中添加视觉辅助工具可能会增加公众对处方药疗效的了解。

相似文献

1
Visual presentations of efficacy data in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print and television advertisements: A randomized study.面向消费者的处方药印刷品和电视广告中疗效数据的视觉呈现:一项随机研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):790-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.015. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
2
Presenting efficacy information in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.在面向消费者的处方药广告中呈现疗效信息。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):271-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
3
Correction of misleading information in prescription drug television advertising: The roles of advertisement similarity and time delay.修正处方药电视广告中的误导性信息:广告相似度和时间延迟的作用。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Mar-Apr;13(2):378-388. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
4
The Effect of Including Quantitative Information on Multiple Endpoints in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Television Advertisements.直接面向消费者的处方药电视广告中纳入多个终点的定量信息的效果。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Nov;39(8):975-985. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19875946. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
5
Effects of comparative claims in prescription drug direct-to-consumer advertising on consumer perceptions and recall.处方药面向消费者的直接广告中的比较性声明对消费者认知和记忆的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.039. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
6
Serious and actionable risks, plus disclosure: Investigating an alternative approach for presenting risk information in prescription drug television advertisements.严重且可采取行动的风险,加上披露:研究一种替代方法,在处方药电视广告中呈现风险信息。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Oct;14(10):951-963. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
7
Visual images of prescription drug benefits in direct-to-consumer television advertisements.直接面向消费者的电视广告中处方药福利的视觉图像。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2240-2249. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
8
Communicating therapeutic indication information in direct-to-consumer television ads for prescription cancer drugs: Exploring the effect of dual-modality presentations.在面向消费者的处方药电视广告中传达癌症治疗适应症信息:探究双模态呈现方式的效果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Mar;132:108598. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108598. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
9
Effect of presentation modality in direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug television advertisements.直接面向消费者(DTC)的处方药电视广告中呈现方式的效果。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Sep;45(5):1330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
10
Communicating efficacy information based on composite scores in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising.在直接面向消费者的处方药广告中基于综合评分传达疗效信息。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Apr;99(4):583-590. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
How Difference Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 2: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.不同任务如何受到概率格式的影响,第2部分:一项使数字有意义的系统评价。
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241310242. doi: 10.1177/23814683241310242. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
2
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.《让数字有意义:健康领域概率沟通的循证综述》的范围、方法及概述性研究结果:一项系统综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
3
How Point (Single-Probability) Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 1: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.点(单概率)任务如何受到概率格式的影响,第1部分:使数字有意义的系统评价
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255333. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255333. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
4
Assessing the Inclusion of Foil Items in a Scale to Measure Recognition of Health Messages.评估用于衡量健康信息认知度的量表中陪衬项目的纳入情况。
Commun Methods Meas. 2021 Jul 3;15(3). doi: 10.1080/19312458.2020.1768520.
5
Risk Ladder, Table, or Bulleted List? Identifying Formats That Effectively Communicate Personalized Risk and Risk Reduction Information for Multiple Diseases.风险阶梯表、表格或项目符号列表?确定有效传达多种疾病个性化风险和风险降低信息的格式。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jan;41(1):74-88. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20968070. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Assessing hearing and cognition challenges in consumer processing of televised risk information: Validation of self-reported measures using performance indicators.评估消费者在处理电视风险信息过程中的听力和认知挑战:使用绩效指标对自我报告测量方法进行验证。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Jun 22;11:145-147. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.06.008. eCollection 2018 Sep.
7
Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.用于急诊护理的共同决策干预措施的开发与测试:一项研究议程。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;23(12):1346-1353. doi: 10.1111/acem.13045.
8
Presenting efficacy information in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.在面向消费者的处方药广告中呈现疗效信息。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):271-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Presenting efficacy information in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.在面向消费者的处方药广告中呈现疗效信息。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):271-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
2
The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.图形显示格式对受教育程度和读写能力较低的成年人对定量风险信息的解读的影响:一项随机实验研究。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):532-44. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11424926. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
3
Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial.交流治疗的获益和危害数据:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):87-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00004.
4
Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.根据计算能力的不同,风险沟通形式对风险感知的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):483-90. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09333122. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
5
Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy.使用图标阵列传达医疗风险:克服低数字素养问题。
Health Psychol. 2009 Mar;28(2):210-6. doi: 10.1037/a0014474.
6
Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey.基于网络的调查吸引了比纸质调查年龄偏差更大且病情更严重的样本。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1068-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.015. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
7
Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms: two randomized trials.使用药品说明书传达药物的益处和危害:两项随机试验
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 21;150(8):516-27. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-8-200904210-00106. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
8
Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics.通过使用更简单的风险图表来提高对辅助治疗方案的理解。
Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;113(12):3382-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23959.
9
Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs.在他莫昔芬预防决策辅助工具中传达副作用风险:象形图的去偏影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.010.
10
Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.传达风险信息:图形显示格式对定量信息感知的影响——准确性、理解与偏好
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Oct 1.