Suppr超能文献

老年患者和护士对传统盆浴与预包装单人护理用品的评估——随机对照试验

Elderly patients' and nurses' assessment of traditional bed bath compared to prepacked single units--randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Nøddeskou Lis Horstmann, Hemmingsen Lars E, Hørdam Britta

机构信息

Medicine Department, Køge Sygehus, Køge, Denmark.

Medicine Department, Koge Hospital, Køge, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun;29(2):347-52. doi: 10.1111/scs.12170. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are two types of bed baths: the traditional basin used with soap and water, and the disposable bath, which is prepacked in single-use units and heated before use.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the traditional basin bed bath to a disposable bed bath, there are four factors that need to be considered: (1) duration and quality of the bath, (2) cost, (3) nurse satisfaction and (4) patient satisfaction.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients received bed baths on two consecutive days - a traditional bed bath on 1 day and a disposable bed bath on the other. The patients were bathed by the same nurse on both days. The baths were observed in relation to duration, use of supplies and quality. Nurses and patients were interviewed about their preferences.

RESULTS

Both types of baths scored very highly in the area of quality. There was no difference in the cost of supplies. Significantly less time was used with the disposable baths (p < 0.001). In terms of total expenditure, the disposable bath cost 11.84 DKK and the basin method cost 11.87 DKK, resulting in an insignificant difference (p > 0.05). Taking the nurses salaries into account, it was much cheaper to bathe patients using the disposable bath. Most patients preferred the disposable bath, while others preferred the basin method or were equally satisfied with both types of baths. There was no significant difference in these results (p > 0.22). There were 46 cases during the trial where nurses preferred the disposable bath method. The washbasin method was preferred in six cases. And there was one case where the nurse was equally satisfied with both types of baths. The nurses rated the disposable bath significantly higher than the basin method. In most cases, patients and nurses preferred the same type of bath (70%).

CONCLUSION

This study presents a comparison of the new method of bed bathing to the traditional basin method, in relation to cost, duration, quality and nurse and patient preference. In the case of disposable baths, the costs are lower as significantly less time is used. The nurses were very clear in their preference for disposable baths, and this was also the case for the majority of patients. There was consistency between the nurses and the patients in terms of their preference of bath type. When patients need assistance with personal hygiene, the nurse should inform the patient about the two methods and involve the patient in the decision.

摘要

背景

床上擦浴有两种类型:使用肥皂和水的传统盆,以及一次性擦浴用品,其预先包装在一次性包装中并在使用前加热。

目的

为了比较传统盆式床上擦浴和一次性床上擦浴,需要考虑四个因素:(1)擦浴的持续时间和质量,(2)成本,(3)护士满意度和(4)患者满意度。

方法

58名患者连续两天接受床上擦浴——一天进行传统床上擦浴,另一天进行一次性床上擦浴。两天均由同一名护士为患者擦浴。观察擦浴的持续时间、用品使用情况和质量。就他们的偏好对护士和患者进行访谈。

结果

两种类型的擦浴在质量方面得分都非常高。用品成本没有差异。使用一次性擦浴用品的时间明显更少(p < 0.001)。在总支出方面,一次性擦浴用品花费11.84丹麦克朗,盆式方法花费11.87丹麦克朗,差异不显著(p > 0.05)。将护士的工资考虑在内,使用一次性擦浴用品为患者擦浴要便宜得多。大多数患者更喜欢一次性擦浴用品,而其他患者更喜欢盆式方法或对两种类型的擦浴同样满意。这些结果没有显著差异(p > 0.22)。试验期间有46例护士更喜欢一次性擦浴方法。有6例更喜欢洗脸盆方法。有1例护士对两种类型的擦浴同样满意。护士对一次性擦浴用品的评价明显高于盆式方法。在大多数情况下,患者和护士更喜欢同一种类型的擦浴(70%)。

结论

本研究对床上擦浴的新方法与传统盆式方法在成本、持续时间、质量以及护士和患者偏好方面进行了比较。对于一次性擦浴用品,成本较低,因为使用时间明显更少。护士非常明确地表示更喜欢一次性擦浴用品,大多数患者也是如此。护士和患者在擦浴类型的偏好方面具有一致性。当患者在个人卫生方面需要帮助时,护士应告知患者这两种方法并让患者参与决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验