Suppr超能文献

与传统床上擦浴相比,无水清洗的效果如何:一项系统综述

How does washing without water perform compared to the traditional bed bath: a systematic review.

作者信息

Groven Fabian M V, Zwakhalen Sandra M G, Odekerken-Schröder Gaby, Joosten Erik J T, Hamers Jan P H

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, PO box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 25;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0425-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For immobile patients, a body wash in bed is sometimes the only bathing option. Traditionally, the bed bath is performed with water and soap. However, alternatives are increasingly used in health care. Washing without water is one such alternative that has been claimed to offer several advantages, such as improved hygiene and skin condition. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence on outcomes of the washing without water concept compared to the traditional bed bath.

METHODS

Controlled trials about washing without water outcomes published after 1994 were collected by means of a systematic literature search in CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PUBMED at the 25th of February, 2016. Additionally, references and citations were searched and experts contacted. Studies were eligible if (1) the study designs included outcomes of washing without water products developed for the full body wash compared to the traditional bed bath, and (2) they were controlled trials. Two researchers independently used a standardized quality checklist to assess the methodological quality of the eligible studies. Finally, outcomes were categorized in (1) physiological outcomes related to hygiene and skin condition, (2) stakeholder-related outcomes, and (3) organizational outcomes in the data synthesis.

RESULTS

Out of 33 potentially relevant articles subjected to full text screening, six studies met the eligibility criteria. Only two studies (of the same research group) were considered of high quality. The results of these high quality studies show that washing without water performed better than the traditional bed bath regarding skin abnormalities and bathing completeness. No differences between washing without water and the traditional bed bath were found for outcomes related to significant skin lesions, resistance during bathing and costs in the studies of high quality.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited moderate to high quality evidence that washing without water is not inferior to the traditional bed bath. Future research on washing without water is needed and should pay special attention to costs, hygiene, and to stakeholder-related outcomes, such as experiences and value perceptions of patients, nursing staff and family.

摘要

背景

对于行动不便的患者,床上擦浴有时是唯一的沐浴方式。传统上,床上擦浴是用水和肥皂进行的。然而,在医疗保健中越来越多地使用替代方法。无水清洗就是这样一种替代方法,据称它具有多种优点,如改善卫生状况和皮肤状况。本系统评价旨在全面概述与传统床上擦浴相比,无水清洗概念的相关证据。

方法

通过在2016年2月25日对CINAHL、Embase、MEDLINE和PUBMED进行系统文献检索,收集1994年后发表的关于无水清洗效果的对照试验。此外,还检索了参考文献和引文,并联系了专家。符合条件的研究需满足:(1)研究设计包括将为全身清洗开发的无水清洗产品的效果与传统床上擦浴进行比较;(2)为对照试验。两名研究人员独立使用标准化质量清单评估符合条件研究的方法学质量。最后,在数据综合中,将结果分为:(1)与卫生状况和皮肤状况相关的生理结果;(2)与利益相关者相关的结果;(3)组织结果。

结果

在33篇经全文筛选的潜在相关文章中,有6项研究符合纳入标准。只有两项研究(来自同一研究小组)被认为质量较高。这些高质量研究的结果表明,在皮肤异常和沐浴完整性方面,无水清洗比传统床上擦浴表现更好。在高质量研究中,无水清洗与传统床上擦浴在与严重皮肤损伤、沐浴时的抵抗力和成本相关的结果方面没有差异。

结论

有有限的中高质量证据表明无水清洗并不比传统床上擦浴差。需要对无水清洗进行进一步研究,应特别关注成本、卫生状况以及与利益相关者相关的结果,如患者、护理人员和家属的体验及价值观念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验