• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保护行为与杀人风险之间的关联:俄克拉荷马州致死性评估研究的结果。

The association between protective actions and homicide risk: findings from the Oklahoma Lethality Assessment Study.

作者信息

Messing Jill Theresa, Campbell Jacquelyn C, Brown Sheryll, Patchell Beverly, Androff David K, Wilson Janet Sullivan

出版信息

Violence Vict. 2014;29(4):543-63. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00013.

DOI:10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00013
PMID:25199385
Abstract

This study focuses on the relationship between women's risk of homicide as measured by the Danger Assessment and 13 protective actions. Participants (N = 432) experienced an incident of police involved intimate partner violence (IPV) and subsequently completed a structured telephone interview. Most women in this sample experienced severe violence and were classified as being at high risk for homicide. Participants engaged in an average of 3.81 (SD = 2.73) protective actions. With the exception of the use of formal domestic violence services, women in the high-risk category were significantly more likely than women in the lower risk category to have used each of the protective actions examined. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

摘要

本研究聚焦于通过危险评估衡量的女性遭受杀人伤害风险与13种保护行为之间的关系。参与者(N = 432)经历了一起涉及警察的亲密伴侣暴力事件,随后完成了一次结构化电话访谈。该样本中的大多数女性经历了严重暴力,并被归类为杀人伤害高风险人群。参与者平均采取了3.81种(标准差 = 2.73)保护行为。除了使用正式的家庭暴力服务外,高风险类别的女性比低风险类别的女性更有可能采取所考察的每一种保护行为。文中讨论了该研究对研究和实践的启示。

相似文献

1
The association between protective actions and homicide risk: findings from the Oklahoma Lethality Assessment Study.保护行为与杀人风险之间的关联:俄克拉荷马州致死性评估研究的结果。
Violence Vict. 2014;29(4):543-63. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00013.
2
Status compatibility and help-seeking behaviors among female intimate partner violence victims.女性亲密伴侣暴力受害者的现状兼容性和求助行为。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Feb;28(3):577-601. doi: 10.1177/0886260512455516. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
3
Pink or blue ... black and blue? Examining pregnancy as a predictor of intimate partner violence and femicide.粉色还是蓝色……青一块紫一块?探究怀孕与亲密伴侣暴力和女性杀害的关系。
Violence Against Women. 2009 Nov;15(11):1273-93. doi: 10.1177/1077801209346714.
4
Safety Strategy Use Among Women Seeking Temporary Protective Orders: The Relationship Between Violence Experienced, Strategy Effectiveness, and Risk Perception.寻求临时保护令的女性对安全策略的使用:所经历的暴力、策略有效性与风险认知之间的关系
Violence Vict. 2015;30(4):614-35. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00003.
5
Barriers to domestic violence help seeking: implications for intervention.寻求家庭暴力救助的障碍:对干预措施的启示
Violence Against Women. 2005 Mar;11(3):290-310. doi: 10.1177/1077801204271959.
6
Factors influencing help-seeking behavior among battered Korean women in intimate relationships.影响亲密关系中受虐韩国女性寻求帮助行为的因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Oct;26(15):2991-3012. doi: 10.1177/0886260510390946. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
7
Help-seeking behaviors and reasons for help seeking reported by a representative sample of women victims of intimate partner violence in New Zealand.新西兰代表性的亲密伴侣暴力女性受害者样本报告的求助行为和求助原因。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 May;25(5):929-51. doi: 10.1177/0886260509336963. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
8
Rural Australian women's legal help seeking for intimate partner violence: women intimate partner violence victim survivors' perceptions of criminal justice support services.农村澳大利亚妇女寻求亲密伴侣暴力的法律帮助:妇女亲密伴侣暴力幸存者对刑事司法支持服务的看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Mar;28(4):685-717. doi: 10.1177/0886260512455864. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
9
Lethal intimate partner violence: an interactional perspective on women's perceptions of lethal incidents.致命的亲密伴侣暴力:关于女性对致命事件认知的互动视角
Violence Vict. 2013;28(5):772-89. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00062.
10
Police-documented incidents of intimate partner violence among young women.警察记录的年轻女性亲密伴侣暴力事件。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Jun;19(6):1079-87. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1612.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Assessment Instruments for Intimate Partner Femicide: A Systematic Review.亲密伴侣杀妻风险评估工具:系统评价
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:896901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896901. eCollection 2022.
2
Patterns and Usefulness of Safety Behaviors Among Community-Based Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.基于社区的亲密伴侣暴力女性幸存者的安全行为模式和实用性。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):8768-8791. doi: 10.1177/0886260519853401. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
3
Cumulative Violence Exposures: Black Women's Responses and Sources of Strength.
累积暴力暴露:黑人女性的应对方式与力量源泉
Soc Work Public Health. 2016;31(3):127-39. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2015.1087917. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
4
Intimate partner sexual violence: a comparison of foreign- versus US-born physically abused Latinas.亲密伴侣性暴力:受身体虐待的美籍拉丁裔与非美籍拉丁裔的比较。
J Urban Health. 2014 Feb;91(1):122-35. doi: 10.1007/s11524-013-9817-8.