Elzagallaai Abdelbaset A, Rieder Michael J
Department of Pediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct;80(4):889-900. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12505. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
Idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) represent a major health problem, as they are unpredictable, often severe and can be life threatening. The low incidence of IDRs makes their detection during drug development stages very difficult causing many post-marketing drug withdrawals and black box warnings. The fact that IDRs are always not predictable based on the drug's known pharmacology and have no clear dose-effect relationship with the culprit drug renders diagnosis of IDRs very challenging, if not impossible, without the aid of a reliable diagnostic test. The drug provocation test (DPT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of IDRs but it is not always safe to perform on patients. In vitro tests have the advantage of bearing no potential harm to patients. However, available in vitro tests are not commonly used clinically because of lack of validation and their complex and expensive procedures. This review discusses the current role of in vitro diagnostic testing for diagnosis of IDRs and gives a brief account of their technical and mechanistic aspects. Advantages, disadvantages and major challenges that prevent these tests from becoming mainstream diagnostic tools are also discussed here.
特异质药物反应(IDR)是一个重大的健康问题,因为它们不可预测,往往很严重,甚至可能危及生命。IDR的低发生率使得在药物研发阶段对其进行检测非常困难,导致许多药物在上市后被撤市并加上黑框警告。IDR总是无法根据药物已知药理学进行预测,并且与致病药物没有明确的剂量效应关系,这使得在没有可靠诊断测试辅助的情况下,IDR的诊断极具挑战性,甚至几乎不可能。药物激发试验(DPT)被认为是诊断IDR的金标准,但对患者进行该试验并不总是安全的。体外试验的优点是对患者没有潜在危害。然而,由于缺乏验证以及其操作复杂且昂贵,现有的体外试验在临床上并不常用。本综述讨论了体外诊断测试在IDR诊断中的当前作用,并简要介绍了其技术和机制方面。还讨论了这些测试未能成为主流诊断工具的优点、缺点和主要挑战。