Correlation of pelvic incidence with cam and pincer lesions.

BACKGROUND

The sacropelvic parameter of pelvic incidence (PI) is a position-independent anatomic parameter that regulates lumbar lordosis and pelvic orientation. While it has been extensively studied in relation to spine pathology, only a single study has correlated PI with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

HYPOTHESIS

Decreased PI would be associated with an increased prevalence of cam and pincer lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Measurements of the acetabulum, proximal femur, and sacropelvis were made bilaterally on 40 cadaveric specimens, for a total of 80 hips. Twenty specimens had the presence of bilateral cam deformities (alpha angle >55°), and 20 age- and sex-matched specimens had bilateral normal hips. Pincer lesions were defined as an anteversion <15°. Pelvic incidence and acetabular version were measured using standardized lateral photographs and a goniometer, respectively. Independent-samples t tests were performed to evaluate for differences in measured parameters between groups.

RESULTS

The mean PI was 43.1° ± 8.6° for hips with a cam lesion and 47.7° ± 9.3° for normal hips, demonstrating a significant association between decreased PI and the presence of a cam lesion (P = .02). The mean version of acetabula with pincer lesions (n = 28) was 11.4° ± 2.5°, and the mean version of normal acetabula (n = 52) was 20.1° ± 3.8°. The mean PI of hips with pincer lesions was 42.5° ± 8.5°, significantly less than that of normal hips, 47.0° ± 9.2° (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

This study supports a recent study that suggested patients with pincer impingement have a smaller PI than the healthy population, and it is the first to demonstrate a significant association between decreased PI and cam-type femoral deformity. Based on results of this study, further clinical study of the effects of pelvic geometry on FAI is warranted.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

While the study results do not prove a causal relationship, it is theorized that the restriction of range of motion and biomechanical adaptations of the pelvis around the hip joints resulting from a smaller PI may affect hip development and FAI. The influence of mechanical factors beyond the hip joint in the development of FAI should be considered by clinicians.