Migliorini Filippo, Maffulli Nicola, Bardazzi Tommaso, Ramasubramanian Swaminathan, Jeyaraman Naveen, Jeyaraman Madhan
Department of Life Sciences, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University of Rome, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 21;13(5):470. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050470.
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a frequently observed hip condition among young, active individuals-especially athletes-that can result in pain, restricted mobility, and a heightened risk of osteoarthritis. Hip arthroscopy has increasingly become the preferred surgical approach for managing FAI due to its ability to alleviate symptoms and improve function. However, potential differences in outcomes between athletes and non-athletes have not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared arthroscopic management for FAI in athletes versus non-athletes. The outcomes of interest were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications.
PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically accessed until October 2024. The studies eligible were clinical investigations comparing athletes and non-athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The outcomes assessed included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Hip Outcome Score for Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and the Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS). Data on reoperation rates and progression to total hip arthroplasty were also extracted. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3.
Three comparative investigations, comprising 808 patients (165 athletes and 643 non-athletes), met the inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were similar across both groups. The analyses demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the PROMs (VAS: = 0.7; HOS-ADL: = 0.5; HOS-SSS: = 0.4), reoperation rates ( = 0.7), or the rate of progression to arthroplasty ( = 0.4) between athletes and non-athletes. Furthermore, meta-analyses of two studies reinforced the absence of significant differences in VAS and HOS-SSS outcomes.
Hip arthroscopy for FAI appears to yield equivalent improvements in pain and functional outcomes for both athletes and non-athletes, with comparable complication rates at an approximate two-year follow-up. Despite the limited number of studies and a moderate risk of bias, the findings support the effectiveness of arthroscopic intervention across varying physical activity levels.
股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)在年轻、活跃的个体中,尤其是运动员中,是一种常见的髋关节疾病,可导致疼痛、活动受限以及骨关节炎风险增加。髋关节镜检查因其能够缓解症状和改善功能,越来越成为治疗FAI的首选手术方法。然而,运动员与非运动员之间的治疗结果潜在差异尚未得到充分研究。本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了运动员与非运动员FAI的关节镜治疗。关注的结果是患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)和并发症。
系统检索PubMed、Web of Science和Embase直至2024年10月。纳入的研究为比较接受髋关节镜治疗FAI的运动员与非运动员的临床研究,最短随访时间为24个月。评估的结局包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、日常生活活动髋关节结局评分(HOS-ADL)以及髋关节结局评分 - 运动特定子量表(HOS-SSS)。还提取了再次手术率和全髋关节置换进展的数据。使用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险,并使用Review Manager 5.3进行荟萃分析。
三项比较研究,共808例患者(165名运动员和643名非运动员),符合纳入标准。两组的基线特征相似。分析表明,运动员与非运动员在PROMs(VAS: = 0.7;HOS-ADL: = 0.5;HOS-SSS: = 0.4)、再次手术率( = 0.7)或关节置换进展率( = 0.4)方面无统计学显著差异。此外,两项研究的荟萃分析进一步证实了VAS和HOS-SSS结局无显著差异。
对于FAI,髋关节镜检查似乎在运动员和非运动员中都能在疼痛和功能结局方面带来同等程度的改善,在大约两年的随访中并发症发生率相当。尽管研究数量有限且存在中度偏倚风险,但研究结果支持关节镜干预在不同身体活动水平下的有效性。