David U. Himmelstein (
Miraya Jun was a research officer at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), in the United Kingdom, at the time of this study. She is now an independent consultant to the LSE.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Sep;33(9):1586-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1327.
A few studies have noted the outsize administrative costs of US hospitals, but no research has compared these costs across multiple nations with various types of health care systems. We assembled a team of international health policy experts to conduct just such a challenging analysis of hospital administrative costs across eight nations: Canada, England, Scotland, Wales, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States. We found that administrative costs accounted for 25.3 percent of total US hospital expenditures--a percentage that is increasing. Next highest were the Netherlands (19.8 percent) and England (15.5 percent), both of which are transitioning to market-oriented payment systems. Scotland and Canada, whose single-payer systems pay hospitals global operating budgets, with separate grants for capital, had the lowest administrative costs. Costs were intermediate in France and Germany (which bill per patient but pay separately for capital projects) and in Wales. Reducing US per capita spending for hospital administration to Scottish or Canadian levels would have saved more than $150 billion in 2011. This study suggests that the reduction of US administrative costs would best be accomplished through the use of a simpler and less market-oriented payment scheme.
一些研究已经注意到美国医院的巨额行政成本,但没有研究比较过具有不同医疗体系的多个国家的这些成本。我们组织了一个国际卫生政策专家小组,对八个国家(加拿大、英国、苏格兰、威尔士、法国、德国、荷兰和美国)的医院行政成本进行了这样一项具有挑战性的分析。我们发现,行政成本占美国医院总支出的 25.3%——这一比例还在上升。其次是荷兰(19.8%)和英国(15.5%),这两个国家都在向以市场为导向的支付系统过渡。苏格兰和加拿大的单一支付方系统按医院的总运营预算支付款项,另外为资本项目提供单独拨款,因此行政成本最低。法国和德国(按病人计费,但为资本项目单独付款)以及威尔士的成本处于中间水平。如果将美国医院管理的人均支出降低到苏格兰或加拿大的水平,那么在 2011 年就可以节省超过 1500 亿美元。本研究表明,通过采用更简单、更少市场化的支付方案,最有可能降低美国的行政成本。