Wamain Yannick, Pluciennicka Ewa, Kalénine Solène
Université Lille Nord de France, F-59000 Lille, France; UDL3, URECA, F-59653 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France.
Université Lille Nord de France, F-59000 Lille, France; UDL3, URECA, F-59653 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Oct;63:249-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.034. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
While neuropsychological dissociations suggest that distinct processes are involved in execution or perception of transitive (object-related) and intransitive (non-object-related) actions, the few neuroimaging studies that directly contrasted the brain activations underlying transitive and intransitive gesture perception failed to find substantial differences between the two action types. However, the distinction could be visible on brain activity timing within the fronto-parietal network. In this study, we used Event-Related Potential (ERP) method to assess the temporal dynamics of object-related and non-object-related action processing. Although both meaningful, only object-related actions involve object motor features. Accordingly, perception of the two action types would show distinct neural correlates. Participants were presented with four movie types (ORA, Object-Related Action, NORA: Non-Object-Related Action and 2 control movies) and were instructed to perform tasks that required explicit or implicit action recognition (specific action recognition or color change detection). Movies were presented as Point-Light Display (PLD) and thus provided only information about gesture kinematics regardless of action type. ERP were computed during movie visual perception and analyzed as a function of movie type and task. The main result revealed a difference between ORA and NORA on the amplitude of the P3a component in the fronto-parietal region. The difference observed around 250 ms after movie onset do not likely origin from variation in low-level visual features or attention resource allocation. Instead, we suggest that it reflects incidental recruitment of object attributes during object-related action perception. The exact nature of these attributes is discussed.
虽然神经心理学解离表明,不同的过程参与了及物(与物体相关)和不及物(与物体无关)动作的执行或感知,但少数直接对比及物和不及物手势感知背后大脑激活情况的神经影像学研究未能发现这两种动作类型之间存在实质性差异。然而,这种差异可能在额顶叶网络内的大脑活动时间上可见。在本研究中,我们使用事件相关电位(ERP)方法来评估与物体相关和与物体无关的动作处理的时间动态。虽然两者都有意义,但只有与物体相关的动作涉及物体运动特征。因此,对这两种动作类型的感知将显示出不同的神经关联。向参与者呈现四种电影类型(ORA,与物体相关的动作;NORA:与物体无关的动作和2部对照电影),并指示他们执行需要明确或隐含动作识别(特定动作识别或颜色变化检测)的任务。电影以点光显示(PLD)的形式呈现,因此无论动作类型如何,都只提供有关手势运动学的信息。在电影视觉感知期间计算ERP,并根据电影类型和任务进行分析。主要结果显示,在额顶叶区域,ORA和NORA在P3a成分的幅度上存在差异。在电影开始后约250毫秒观察到的差异不太可能源于低级视觉特征或注意力资源分配的变化。相反,我们认为它反映了在与物体相关的动作感知过程中物体属性的偶然招募。讨论了这些属性的确切性质。