Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC; Graduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC; Neurobiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Center, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC; Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
Department of Linguistics and Translation, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, USA.
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 15;167:331-341. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.045. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
"Two route" theories of object-related action processing posit different temporal activation profiles of grasp-to-move actions (rapidly evoked based on object structure) versus skilled use actions (more slowly activated based on semantic knowledge). We capitalized on the exquisite temporal resolution and multidimensionality of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to directly test this hypothesis. Participants viewed manipulable objects (e.g., calculator) preceded by objects sharing either "grasp", "use", or no action attributes (e.g., bar of soap, keyboard, earring, respectively), as well as by action-unrelated but taxonomically-related objects (e.g., abacus); participants judged whether the two objects were related. The results showed more positive responses to "grasp-to-move" primed objects than "skilled use" primed objects or unprimed objects starting in the P1 (0-150 ms) time window and continuing onto the subsequent N1 and P2 components (150-300 ms), suggesting that only "grasp-to-move", but not "skilled use", actions may facilitate visual attention to object attributes. Furthermore, reliably reduced N400s (300-500 ms), an index of semantic processing, were observed to taxonomically primed and "skilled use" primed objects relative to unprimed objects, suggesting that "skilled use" action attributes are a component of distributed, multimodal semantic representations of objects. Together, our findings provide evidence supporting two-route theories by demonstrating that "grasp-to-move" and "skilled use" actions impact different aspects of object processing and highlight the relationship of "skilled use" information to other aspects of semantic memory.
“双路径”理论认为,与物体相关的动作处理存在两种不同的时间激活模式:抓取-移动动作(基于物体结构快速激发)与熟练使用动作(基于语义知识较慢激发)。我们利用事件相关电位(ERPs)的精确时间分辨率和多维性直接检验了这一假设。参与者观看了可操作的物体(例如计算器),这些物体之前呈现的是具有“抓取”、“使用”或无动作属性的物体(例如肥皂、键盘、耳环),以及与动作无关但具有分类学关系的物体(例如算盘);参与者判断这两个物体是否相关。结果显示,在 P1(0-150ms)时间窗口中,对“抓取-移动”启动的物体的反应比“熟练使用”启动的物体或未启动的物体更积极,并且持续到随后的 N1 和 P2 成分(150-300ms),这表明只有“抓取-移动”,而不是“熟练使用”,的动作可能有助于视觉注意物体属性。此外,还观察到与未启动物体相比,分类学启动和“熟练使用”启动的物体的 N400s(300-500ms)明显减少,这是语义处理的一个指标,这表明“熟练使用”的动作属性是物体分布式多模态语义表示的一个组成部分。总之,我们的发现通过证明“抓取-移动”和“熟练使用”动作影响物体处理的不同方面,为“双路径”理论提供了证据,并强调了“熟练使用”信息与语义记忆其他方面的关系。