Suppr超能文献

动作属性可操作物体诱发的感觉和语义激活:来自 ERP 的证据。

Sensory and semantic activations evoked by action attributes of manipulable objects: Evidence from ERPs.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC; Graduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC; Neurobiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Center, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC; Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.

Department of Linguistics and Translation, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 15;167:331-341. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.045. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

Abstract

"Two route" theories of object-related action processing posit different temporal activation profiles of grasp-to-move actions (rapidly evoked based on object structure) versus skilled use actions (more slowly activated based on semantic knowledge). We capitalized on the exquisite temporal resolution and multidimensionality of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to directly test this hypothesis. Participants viewed manipulable objects (e.g., calculator) preceded by objects sharing either "grasp", "use", or no action attributes (e.g., bar of soap, keyboard, earring, respectively), as well as by action-unrelated but taxonomically-related objects (e.g., abacus); participants judged whether the two objects were related. The results showed more positive responses to "grasp-to-move" primed objects than "skilled use" primed objects or unprimed objects starting in the P1 (0-150 ms) time window and continuing onto the subsequent N1 and P2 components (150-300 ms), suggesting that only "grasp-to-move", but not "skilled use", actions may facilitate visual attention to object attributes. Furthermore, reliably reduced N400s (300-500 ms), an index of semantic processing, were observed to taxonomically primed and "skilled use" primed objects relative to unprimed objects, suggesting that "skilled use" action attributes are a component of distributed, multimodal semantic representations of objects. Together, our findings provide evidence supporting two-route theories by demonstrating that "grasp-to-move" and "skilled use" actions impact different aspects of object processing and highlight the relationship of "skilled use" information to other aspects of semantic memory.

摘要

“双路径”理论认为,与物体相关的动作处理存在两种不同的时间激活模式:抓取-移动动作(基于物体结构快速激发)与熟练使用动作(基于语义知识较慢激发)。我们利用事件相关电位(ERPs)的精确时间分辨率和多维性直接检验了这一假设。参与者观看了可操作的物体(例如计算器),这些物体之前呈现的是具有“抓取”、“使用”或无动作属性的物体(例如肥皂、键盘、耳环),以及与动作无关但具有分类学关系的物体(例如算盘);参与者判断这两个物体是否相关。结果显示,在 P1(0-150ms)时间窗口中,对“抓取-移动”启动的物体的反应比“熟练使用”启动的物体或未启动的物体更积极,并且持续到随后的 N1 和 P2 成分(150-300ms),这表明只有“抓取-移动”,而不是“熟练使用”,的动作可能有助于视觉注意物体属性。此外,还观察到与未启动物体相比,分类学启动和“熟练使用”启动的物体的 N400s(300-500ms)明显减少,这是语义处理的一个指标,这表明“熟练使用”的动作属性是物体分布式多模态语义表示的一个组成部分。总之,我们的发现通过证明“抓取-移动”和“熟练使用”动作影响物体处理的不同方面,为“双路径”理论提供了证据,并强调了“熟练使用”信息与语义记忆其他方面的关系。

相似文献

1
Sensory and semantic activations evoked by action attributes of manipulable objects: Evidence from ERPs.
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 15;167:331-341. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.045. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
2
A saw is first identified as an object used on wood: ERP evidence for temporal differences between Thematic and Functional similarity relations.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 May;71:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.034. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
3
Grasp representations depend on knowledge and attention.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Feb;44(2):268-279. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000453. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
4
Semantic memory retrieval: cortical couplings in object recognition in the N400 window.
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Feb;21(4):1139-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03906.x.
5
The N400-concreteness effect reflects the retrieval of semantic information during the preparation of meaningful actions.
Biol Psychol. 2010 Sep;85(1):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
6
Conflict between gesture representations extinguishes μ rhythm desynchronization during manipulable object perception: An EEG study.
Biol Psychol. 2018 Feb;132:202-211. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
7
Selecting object pairs for action: Is the active object always first?
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2269-81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4296-7. Epub 2015 May 1.
9
The ground side of an object: perceived as shapeless yet processed for semantics.
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):256-64. doi: 10.1177/0956797613502814. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
Visual context modulates potentiation of grasp types during semantic object categorization.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):645-51. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0536-7.

引用本文的文献

1
No need to integrate action information during coarse semantic processing of man-made tools.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2230-2239. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02301-6. Epub 2023 May 23.
2
The different effects of breaking an object at different time points.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):942-952. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02210-0. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
3
The dominant role of functional action representation in object recognition.
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Feb;237(2):363-375. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5426-9. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

1
SPATIO-MOTOR REPRESENTATIONS IN REACHING: EVIDENCE FOR SUBTYPES OF OPTIC ATAXIA.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 May 1;15(3):279-312. doi: 10.1080/026432998381186.
3
Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.
Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):499-520. doi: 10.1037/bul0000092. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
4
Tool selection and the ventral-dorsal organization of tool-related knowledge.
Physiol Rep. 2017 Feb;5(3). doi: 10.14814/phy2.13078.
5
Thematic knowledge, artifact concepts, and the left posterior temporal lobe: Where action and object semantics converge.
Cortex. 2016 Sep;82:164-178. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
6
The neural network for tool-related cognition: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of 70 neuroimaging contrasts.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 May-Jun;33(3-4):241-56. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1188798. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
7
For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):991-1001. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0870-z.
8
Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex.
Nature. 2016 Apr 28;532(7600):453-8. doi: 10.1038/nature17637.
10
Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 19;9:351. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00351. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验