James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA ; Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014 Aug 14;5. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.23797. eCollection 2014.
Although there are no established biomarkers for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as yet, biological investigations of PTSD have made progress identifying the pathophysiology of PTSD. Given the biological and clinical complexity of PTSD, it is increasingly unlikely that a single biomarker of disease will be identified. Rather, investigations will more likely identify different biomarkers that indicate the presence of clinically significant PTSD symptoms, associate with risk for PTSD following trauma exposure, and predict or identify recovery. While there has been much interest in PTSD biomarkers, there has been less discussion of their potential clinical applications, and of the social, legal, and ethical implications of such biomarkers.
This article will discuss possible applications of PTSD biomarkers, including the social, legal, and ethical implications of such biomarkers, with an emphasis on military applications.
Literature on applications of PTSD biomarkers and on potential ethical and legal implications will be reviewed.
Biologically informed research findings hold promise for prevention, assessment, treatment planning, and the development of prophylactic and treatment interventions. As with any biological indicator of disorder, there are potentially positive and negative clinical, social, legal, and ethical consequences of using such biomarkers.
Potential clinical applications of PTSD biomarkers hold promise for clinicians, patients, and employers. The search for biomarkers of PTSD should occur in tandem with an interdisciplinary discussion regarding the potential implications of applying biological findings in clinical and employment settings.
尽管目前尚未确定创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的既定生物标志物,但 PTSD 的生物学研究已经在确定 PTSD 的病理生理学方面取得了进展。鉴于 PTSD 的生物学和临床复杂性,不太可能确定单一的疾病生物标志物。相反,研究更有可能确定不同的生物标志物,这些标志物表明存在具有临床意义的 PTSD 症状,与创伤暴露后 PTSD 的风险相关,并预测或识别恢复情况。尽管人们对 PTSD 生物标志物非常感兴趣,但对它们的潜在临床应用以及此类生物标志物的社会、法律和伦理影响的讨论较少。
本文将讨论 PTSD 生物标志物的可能应用,包括此类生物标志物的社会、法律和伦理影响,重点是军事应用。
将回顾 PTSD 生物标志物应用以及潜在的伦理和法律影响的文献。
受生物学启发的研究结果为预防、评估、治疗计划以及预防性和治疗性干预措施的开发提供了希望。与任何疾病的生物指标一样,使用此类生物标志物可能会带来潜在的积极和消极的临床、社会、法律和伦理后果。
PTSD 生物标志物的潜在临床应用为临床医生、患者和雇主带来了希望。在寻找 PTSD 生物标志物的同时,应进行跨学科讨论,以探讨在临床和就业环境中应用生物学发现的潜在影响。