Lee Larissa J, Bu Paula, Feltmate Colleen, Viswanathan Akila N
*Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; †Harvard Medical School; and ‡Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Oct;24(8):1441-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000248.
The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for women with node-positive, high-grade adenocarcinoma of the uterus.
Database review identified 73 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC 1/2 grade 3 endometrial cancer diagnosed from 1995 to 2009. Study inclusion required total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and negative chest imaging. Histologic subtypes were endometrioid (22, 30%), papillary serous (20, 27%), clear cell (9, 12%), mixed (21, 29%), and undifferentiated (1, 1%). Adjuvant treatment was chemotherapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in 55 patients (75%), EBRT alone in 14 (19%), chemotherapy in 2 (3%), and no adjuvant therapy in 2 (3%).
With a median follow-up of 50 months, DFS/OS rates at 5 years were 44%/53%, respectively. Intraperitoneal relapse was more common in patients with positive cytology (30% vs 6%, P = 0.02) and nonendometrioid histology (16% vs 4%, P = 0.3). By histologic subtype, 5-year DFS/OS rates were 59%/82% for grade 3 endometrioid, 25%/30% for serous, 22%/17% for clear cell, and 50%/51% for mixed histology (P = 0.1/P < 0.001). The 5-year DFS/OS rates were 56%/68% for those who received both chemotherapy and EBRT. Among patients treated with adjuvant EBRT, pelvic control was 93%.
For node-positive, high-grade endometrial cancer, patients with endometrioid and mixed histologic subtypes had better clinical outcomes than did those with serous and clear cell cancers. Distinct patterns of relapse were observed with a greater risk of intraperitoneal failure for nonendometrioid histologic subtypes. Future studies are needed to define the optimal chemotherapy regimen and radiation fields.
本研究的目的是评估子宫淋巴结阳性、高级别腺癌女性患者的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)等临床结局。
通过数据库回顾,确定了1995年至2009年诊断为国际妇产科联盟IIIC期1/2级3型子宫内膜癌的73例患者。研究纳入要求行全腹子宫切除术/双侧输卵管卵巢切除术且胸部影像学检查阴性。组织学亚型包括子宫内膜样癌(22例,30%)、乳头状浆液性癌(20例,27%)、透明细胞癌(9例,12%)、混合型(21例,29%)和未分化型(1例,1%)。55例患者(75%)接受辅助化疗联合体外放射治疗(EBRT),14例(19%)仅接受EBRT,2例(3%)接受化疗,2例(3%)未接受辅助治疗。
中位随访50个月,5年DFS/OS率分别为44%/53%。细胞学阳性患者(30%对6%,P = 0.02)和非子宫内膜样组织学患者(16%对4%,P = 0.3)腹腔内复发更为常见。按组织学亚型,3级子宫内膜样癌患者5年DFS/OS率为59%/82%,浆液性癌为25%/30%,透明细胞癌为22%/17%,混合型组织学为50%/51%(P = 0.1/P < 0.001)。接受化疗和EBRT的患者5年DFS/OS率为56%/68%。在接受辅助EBRT的患者中,盆腔控制率为93%。
对于淋巴结阳性、高级别子宫内膜癌,子宫内膜样和混合型组织学亚型患者的临床结局优于浆液性和透明细胞癌患者。观察到不同的复发模式,非子宫内膜样组织学亚型患者腹腔内失败风险更高。未来需要开展研究以确定最佳化疗方案和放射野。