Liang Lusha W, Perez Alexendar R, Cangemi Nicholas A, Zhou Qin, Iasonos Alexia, Abu-Rustum Nadeem, Alektiar Kaled M, Makker Vicky
*Weill Cornell Medical College; and †Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, ‡Epidemiology and Biostatistics, §Gynecologic Service, Department of Surgery, and ∥Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Mar;26(3):497-504. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000635.
To determine clinical outcomes in patients with stage IA polyp-limited versus endometrium-limited high-grade (type II) endometrial carcinoma (EC).
We identified all cases of stage IA polyp-limited or endometrium-limited high-grade EC (FIGO grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, or mixed) who underwent simple hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal washings, omental biopsy, and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection and received adjuvant treatment at our institution from October 1995 to November 2012. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by histology, adjuvant therapy, and polyp-limited versus endometrium-limited disease status were determined using log-rank test. We analyzed 3 treatment groups: patients who received chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy (RT) (intravaginal or pelvic); patients who received RT (intravaginal RT or pelvic RT) alone; and patients who received no adjuvant treatment.
In all, 85 women underwent hysterectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy; all were surgically staged with lymph node assessment and had stage IA EC with no lymphovascular or myometrial invasion. Median follow-up for survivors was 46.5 months (range, 1.98-188.8 months). Forty-nine patients (57.6%) had polyp-limited disease, and 36 (42.4%) had endometrium-limited disease. There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic characteristics between patients within the 3 treatment groups with regard to age at diagnosis, mean body mass index, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status, polyp-limited or endometrium-limited disease, diabetes, or race. The 3-year PFS rate was 94.9% and the 3-year OS rate was 98.8%. Univariate PFS and OS analysis revealed that age was a relevant prognostic factor (PFS hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.13 [1.02-1.25]; P = 0.022; OS hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.19 [1.02-1.38]; P = 0.03). Adjuvant treatment did not impact outcomes.
Clinical outcomes of surgical stage IA type II polyp- or endometrium-limited high-grade epithelial EC are equally favorable regardless of histologic subtype or adjuvant therapy received. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in this select group remains to be determined.
确定局限于息肉或局限于子宫内膜的IA期高级别(II型)子宫内膜癌(EC)患者的临床结局。
我们纳入了1995年10月至2012年11月在本机构接受单纯子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术、腹腔冲洗、大网膜活检以及盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫并接受辅助治疗的所有局限于息肉或局限于子宫内膜的IA期高级别EC病例(FIGO 3级子宫内膜样癌、浆液性癌、透明细胞癌或混合型)。通过对数秩检验确定按组织学、辅助治疗以及局限于息肉与局限于子宫内膜的疾病状态划分的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。我们分析了3个治疗组:接受化疗联合或不联合放疗(RT)(阴道内或盆腔放疗)的患者;仅接受RT(阴道内RT或盆腔RT)的患者;以及未接受辅助治疗的患者。
共有85名女性接受了子宫切除术/输卵管卵巢切除术;所有患者均通过淋巴结评估进行了手术分期,均为IA期EC,无淋巴管或肌层浸润。幸存者的中位随访时间为46.5个月(范围为1.98 - 188.8个月)。49例患者(57.6%)为局限于息肉的疾病,36例(42.4%)为局限于子宫内膜的疾病。3个治疗组患者在诊断时的年龄、平均体重指数、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态、局限于息肉或局限于子宫内膜的疾病、糖尿病或种族等临床病理特征方面无显著差异。3年PFS率为94.9%,3年OS率为98.8%。单因素PFS和OS分析显示年龄是一个相关的预后因素(PFS风险比[95%置信区间],1.13[1.02 - 1.25];P = 0.022;OS风险比[95%置信区间],1.19[1.02 - 1.38];P = 0.03)。辅助治疗未影响结局。
无论组织学亚型或接受的辅助治疗如何,手术分期为IA期的II型局限于息肉或局限于子宫内膜的高级别上皮性EC的临床结局同样良好。该特定组中辅助治疗的益处仍有待确定。