Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 18;16(14):2561. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142561.
Adjuvant treatment in advanced-stage (stages III /IV) endometrial carcinomas in terms of tumor grades has not yet been explored. We retrospectively analyzed 194 patients with advanced-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who received surgery, followed by adjuvant therapy, at National Taiwan University Hospital between January 1, 2000 and August 31, 2017. Adjuvant therapies included radiation (RT), chemotherapy alone (CT), and combined modality treatment (CMT: radiation and chemotherapy). The prognostic factors were determined from multivariate survival analyses using Cox regression models. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up was 45.5 months (range: 6.2-207.9). In grade 1/2 endometrioid carcinoma, neither adjuvant CT nor CMT could prolong PFS significantly compared to RT (CT: HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.64-3.97; CMT: HR 2.03, 95% CI 0.72-5.74). Notably, maximal cytoreduction independently improved PFS (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.90). No particular adjuvant treatment provided an OS advantage over the others for grade 1/2 endometrioid carcinomas. However, for grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma, CMT showed OS benefits (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.89) compared to RT and CT. In conclusion, maximal cytoreduction should be the goal in patients with grade 1/2 advanced-stage endometrioid carcinomas. Based on our results, patients with grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas might benefit from adjuvant CMT.
在高级别(III/IV 期)子宫内膜癌中,针对肿瘤分级的辅助治疗尚未得到探索。我们回顾性分析了 194 例于 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 8 月 31 日期间在国立台湾大学医院接受手术并接受辅助治疗的晚期子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌患者。辅助治疗包括放疗(RT)、单纯化疗(CT)和联合治疗(CMT:放疗和化疗)。使用 Cox 回归模型的多变量生存分析确定预后因素。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。中位随访时间为 45.5 个月(范围:6.2-207.9)。在 1/2 级子宫内膜样癌中,与 RT 相比,辅助 CT 或 CMT 均不能显著延长 PFS(CT:HR 1.59,95%CI 0.64-3.97;CMT:HR 2.03,95%CI 0.72-5.74)。值得注意的是,最大程度的肿瘤减灭术独立改善了 PFS(HR 0.31,95%CI 0.10-0.90)。对于 1/2 级子宫内膜样癌,没有任何特定的辅助治疗在 OS 方面优于其他治疗。然而,对于 3 级子宫内膜样癌,与 RT 和 CT 相比,CMT 显示出 OS 优势(HR 0.15,95%CI 0.03-0.89)。总之,对于 1/2 级晚期子宫内膜样癌患者,最大程度的肿瘤减灭术应是治疗目标。基于我们的结果,3 级子宫内膜样癌患者可能受益于辅助 CMT。