• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉单词识别的实时功能架构。

Real-time functional architecture of visual word recognition.

作者信息

Whiting Caroline, Shtyrov Yury, Marslen-Wilson William

机构信息

University of Cambridge.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Feb;27(2):246-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00699.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00699
PMID:25208741
Abstract

Despite a century of research into visual word recognition, basic questions remain unresolved about the functional architecture of the process that maps visual inputs from orthographic analysis onto lexical form and meaning and about the units of analysis in terms of which these processes are conducted. Here we use magnetoencephalography, supported by a masked priming behavioral study, to address these questions using contrasting sets of simple (walk), complex (swimmer), and pseudo-complex (corner) forms. Early analyses of orthographic structure, detectable in bilateral posterior temporal regions within a 150-230 msec time frame, are shown to segment the visual input into linguistic substrings (words and morphemes) that trigger lexical access in left middle temporal locations from 300 msec. These are primarily feedforward processes and are not initially constrained by lexical-level variables. Lexical constraints become significant from 390 msec, in both simple and complex words, with increased processing of pseudowords and pseudo-complex forms. These results, consistent with morpho-orthographic models based on masked priming data, map out the real-time functional architecture of visual word recognition, establishing basic feedforward processing relationships between orthographic form, morphological structure, and lexical meaning.

摘要

尽管对视觉单词识别已经进行了一个世纪的研究,但关于将来自正字法分析的视觉输入映射到词汇形式和意义的过程的功能架构,以及进行这些过程所依据的分析单元等基本问题仍未得到解决。在此,我们利用脑磁图技术,并辅以一项掩蔽启动行为研究,通过使用对比组的简单形式(walk)、复杂形式(swimmer)和伪复杂形式(corner)来解决这些问题。在150 - 230毫秒时间范围内,双侧后颞叶区域可检测到的早期正字法结构分析,显示将视觉输入分割为语言子串(单词和词素),这些子串从300毫秒起在左中颞叶位置触发词汇访问。这些主要是前馈过程,最初不受词汇层面变量的限制。从390毫秒起,在简单词和复杂词中,随着对伪词和伪复杂形式处理的增加,词汇限制变得显著。这些结果与基于掩蔽启动数据的形态正字法模型一致,描绘出了视觉单词识别的实时功能架构,确立了正字法形式、形态结构和词汇意义之间的基本前馈处理关系。

相似文献

1
Real-time functional architecture of visual word recognition.视觉单词识别的实时功能架构。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Feb;27(2):246-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00699.
2
Evidence for early morphological decomposition: combining masked priming with magnetoencephalography.早期形态分解的证据:结合掩蔽启动与脑磁图。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3366-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00035. Epub 2011 May 10.
3
Reading in a deep orthography: neuromagnetic evidence for dual-mechanisms.深度正字法阅读:双机制的神经磁学证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;180(2):247-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0852-0. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
4
Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition.视觉单词识别过程中形态分解的神经关联
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):1983-93. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1983.
5
The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition.视觉词汇识别的要素、时间、地点和方式。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Feb;18(2):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
6
A neuronal gamma oscillatory signature during morphological unification in the left occipitotemporal junction.左侧枕颞叶交界处形态整合过程中的神经元γ振荡特征。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Dec;35(12):5847-60. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22589. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
The neural basis of obligatory decomposition of suffixed words.后缀词拆分的神经基础。
Brain Lang. 2011 Sep;118(3):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 26.
8
Early Visual Word Processing Is Flexible: Evidence from Spatiotemporal Brain Dynamics.早期视觉单词处理具有灵活性:来自脑电时空动态的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Sep;27(9):1738-51. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00815. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
Context-Based Facilitation in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Visual and Lexical But Not Pre-Lexical Contributions.语境促进视词汇识别:来自视觉和词汇但非词汇前加工的证据。
eNeuro. 2019 May 9;6(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0321-18.2019. Print 2019 Mar/Apr.
10
Temporal Unfolding of Spelling-to-Sound Mappings in Visual (Pseudo)word Recognition.视觉(伪)词识别中拼写-发音映射的时间展开
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jul 1;37(7):1202-1215. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02293.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Mechanisms of Learning and Consolidation of Morphologically Derived Words in a Novel Language: Evidence From Hebrew Speakers.新语言中形态衍生词学习与巩固的神经机制:来自希伯来语使用者的证据
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Sep 11;5(4):864-900. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00150. eCollection 2024.
2
Automatic morpheme identification across development: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) evidence from fast periodic visual stimulation.跨发育阶段的自动词素识别:来自快速周期性视觉刺激的脑磁图(MEG)证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 7;13:932952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932952. eCollection 2022.
3
What Language Disorders Reveal About the Mechanisms of Morphological Processing.
语言障碍揭示了形态加工机制的哪些方面。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 29;12:701802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701802. eCollection 2021.
4
Word and Face Recognition Processing Based on Response Times and Ex-Gaussian Components.基于反应时间和前高斯成分的单词与面部识别处理
Entropy (Basel). 2021 May 8;23(5):580. doi: 10.3390/e23050580.
5
Opacity, Transparency, and Morphological Priming: A Study of Prefixed Verbs in Dutch.不透明度、透明度与形态启动:一项关于荷兰语前缀动词的研究。
J Mem Lang. 2020 Feb;110. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104055. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
6
How the brain composes morphemes into meaning.大脑如何将语素组合成意义。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190311. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0311. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Prefix Stripping Re-Re-Revisited: MEG Investigations of Morphological Decomposition and Recomposition.前缀剥离再探:形态分解与重组的脑磁图研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 6;10:1964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01964. eCollection 2019.
8
The Form of Morphemes: MEG Evidence From Masked Priming of Two Hebrew Templates.语素的形式:来自两种希伯来语模板的掩蔽启动的脑磁图证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02163. eCollection 2018.
9
Information properties of morphologically complex words modulate brain activity during word reading.形态复杂词的信息属性在单词阅读过程中调节大脑活动。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jun;39(6):2583-2595. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24025. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
The neural correlates of morphological complexity processing: Detecting structure in pseudowords.形态复杂度处理的神经关联:在伪词中检测结构。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jun;39(6):2317-2328. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23975. Epub 2018 Mar 2.