• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前缀剥离再探:形态分解与重组的脑磁图研究

Prefix Stripping Re-Re-Revisited: MEG Investigations of Morphological Decomposition and Recomposition.

作者信息

Stockall Linnaea, Manouilidou Christina, Gwilliams Laura, Neophytou Kyriaki, Marantz Alec

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Comparative and General Linguistics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 6;10:1964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01964. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01964
PMID:31551860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6743348/
Abstract

We revisit a long-standing question in the psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic literature on comprehending morphologically complex words: are prefixes and suffixes processed using the same cognitive mechanisms? Recent work using Magnetoencephalography (MEG) to uncover the dynamic temporal and spatial responses evoked by visually presented complex suffixed single words provide us with a comprehensive picture of morphological processing in the brain, from early, form-based decomposition, through lexical access, grammatically constrained recomposition, and semantic interpretation. In the present study, we find that MEG responses to prefixed words reveal interesting early differences in the lateralization of the form-based decomposition response compared to the effects reported in the literature for suffixed words, but a very similar post-decomposition profile. These results not only address a question stretching back to the earliest days of modern psycholinguistics, but also add critical support and nuance to our much newer emerging understanding of spatial organization and temporal dynamics of morphological processing in the human brain.

摘要

我们重新审视了心理语言学和神经语言学文献中一个长期存在的关于理解形态复杂单词的问题

前缀和后缀的处理是否使用相同的认知机制?最近利用脑磁图(MEG)来揭示视觉呈现的复杂后缀单字所引发的动态时间和空间反应的研究,为我们提供了大脑中形态处理的全面图景,从早期基于形式的分解,到词汇通达、语法约束的重新组合以及语义解释。在本研究中,我们发现,与文献中报道的后缀单词的效应相比,MEG对前缀单词的反应在基于形式的分解反应的侧化方面显示出有趣的早期差异,但在分解后的模式非常相似。这些结果不仅解决了一个可追溯到现代心理语言学早期的问题,也为我们对人类大脑中形态处理的空间组织和时间动态的最新理解增添了关键的支持和细微差别。

相似文献

1
Prefix Stripping Re-Re-Revisited: MEG Investigations of Morphological Decomposition and Recomposition.前缀剥离再探:形态分解与重组的脑磁图研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 6;10:1964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01964. eCollection 2019.
2
Derivational Morphology in Agrammatic Aphasia: A Comparison Between Prefixed and Suffixed Words.语法缺失性失语症中的派生词形态学:前缀词和后缀词的比较
Front Psychol. 2020 May 29;11:1070. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01070. eCollection 2020.
3
Syntactic and semantic restrictions on morphological recomposition: MEG evidence from Greek.形态重组的句法和语义限制:来自希腊语的脑磁图证据。
Brain Lang. 2018 Aug;183:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 26.
4
Evidence for morphological composition in compound words using MEG.使用脑磁图(MEG)研究复合词中形态成分的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 28;9:215. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00215. eCollection 2015.
5
[Derivational morphology and lexical access: prefixed and pseudo-prefixed verbs].[派生词形态学与词汇通达:带前缀和伪前缀动词]
Can J Exp Psychol. 1996 Dec;50(4):371-85.
6
The neural basis of obligatory decomposition of suffixed words.后缀词拆分的神经基础。
Brain Lang. 2011 Sep;118(3):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 26.
7
Processing prefixes and suffixes in handwriting production.手写书写过程中前缀和后缀的处理
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jul;140(3):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
8
Early Form-Based Morphological Decomposition in Tagalog: MEG Evidence from Reduplication, Infixation, and Circumfixation.他加禄语中基于早期形式的形态分解:来自重叠、中缀和框缀的脑磁图证据
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Feb 16;3(2):235-255. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00062. eCollection 2022.
9
MorphoLex-FR: A derivational morphological database for 38,840 French words.MorphoLex-FR:一个包含 38840 个法文字词的衍生形态学数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1008-1025. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01297-z.
10
Neural dynamics of inflectional and derivational morphology processing in the human brain.人类大脑中屈折和派生形态处理的神经动力学。
Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2758-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
On the role of stems and prefixes in reading complex nonwords: Evidence from individuals with and without acquired dyslexia.关于词干和词缀在阅读复杂非词中的作用:来自获得性阅读障碍患者和非患者的证据。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2024 Oct-Dec;41(7-8):332-358. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2025.2505531. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
The Role of Aspect During Deverbal Word Processing in Greek.“体”在希腊语动词派生词处理过程中的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2025 Jan 11;54(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10112-6.
3
Early Form-Based Morphological Decomposition in Tagalog: MEG Evidence from Reduplication, Infixation, and Circumfixation.

本文引用的文献

1
Building words and phrases in the left temporal lobe.在左颞叶构建单词和短语。
Cortex. 2018 Sep;106:213-236. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
Syntactic and semantic restrictions on morphological recomposition: MEG evidence from Greek.形态重组的句法和语义限制:来自希腊语的脑磁图证据。
Brain Lang. 2018 Aug;183:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 26.
3
Morphological representations are extrapolated from morpho-syntactic rules.形态表示是从形态句法规则推断出来的。
他加禄语中基于早期形式的形态分解:来自重叠、中缀和框缀的脑磁图证据
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Feb 16;3(2):235-255. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00062. eCollection 2022.
4
What Language Disorders Reveal About the Mechanisms of Morphological Processing.语言障碍揭示了形态加工机制的哪些方面。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 29;12:701802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701802. eCollection 2021.
5
From letters to composed concepts: A magnetoencephalography study of reading.从字母到组合概念:一项关于阅读的脑磁图研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 15;42(15):5130-5153. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25608. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jun;114:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
4
Functional characterisation of letter-specific responses in time, space and current polarity using magnetoencephalography.使用脑磁图在时间、空间和电流极性方面对字母特异性反应进行功能表征。
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:320-333. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.057. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
5
Processing complex pseudo-words in mild cognitive impairment: The interaction of preserved morphological rule knowledge with compromised cognitive ability.轻度认知障碍中复杂伪词的加工:保留的形态规则知识与受损认知能力的相互作用。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2016;30(1):49-67. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1102970. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
6
Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the full decomposition model of complex visual word recognition.分解、查找与重组:复杂视觉单词识别完整分解模型的脑磁图证据
Brain Lang. 2015 Apr;143:81-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
7
Real-time functional architecture of visual word recognition.视觉单词识别的实时功能架构。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Feb;27(2):246-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00699.
8
MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python.使用 MNE-Python 进行 MEG 和 EEG 数据分析。
Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 26;7:267. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267.
9
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
10
MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.MEG 和 EEG 数据处理的 MNE 软件。
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:446-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027. Epub 2013 Oct 24.