Suppr超能文献

巴西白人成年人的 FVC、FEV1 和 FEV1/FVC 比值参考值与全球肺功能倡议 2012 年建议值的比较。

Comparison between reference values for FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC ratio in White adults in Brazil and those suggested by the Global Lung Function Initiative 2012.

机构信息

Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil.

出版信息

J Bras Pneumol. 2014 Jul-Aug;40(4):397-402. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132014000400007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the spirometry values predicted by the 2012 Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) equations, which are recommended for international use, in comparison with those obtained for a sample of White adults used for the establishment of reference equations for spirometry in Brazil.

METHODS

The sample comprised 270 and 373 healthy males and females, respectively. The mean differences between the values found in this sample and the predicted values calculated from the GLI equations for FVC, FEV1, and VEF1/FVC, as well as their lower limits, were compared by paired t-test. The predicted values by each pair of equations were compared in various combinations of age and height.

RESULTS

For the males in our study sample, the values obtained for all of the variables studied were significantly higher than those predicted by the GLI equations (p < 0.01 for all). These differences become more evident in subjects who were shorter in stature and older. For the females in our study sample, only the lower limit of the FEV1/FVC ratio was significantly higher than that predicted by the GLI equation.

CONCLUSIONS

The predicted values suggested by the GLI equations for White adults were significantly lower than those used as reference values for males in Brazil. For both genders, the lower limit of the FEV1/FVC ratio is significantly lower than that predicted by the GLI equations.

摘要

目的

评估国际推荐使用的 2012 年全球肺功能倡议(GLI)方程预测的肺功能值,与为制定巴西肺功能参考方程而建立的白人成年人样本中获得的值进行比较。

方法

该样本包括分别为 270 名和 373 名健康男性和女性。通过配对 t 检验比较该样本中发现的数值与 GLI 方程计算得出的 FVC、FEV1 和 VEF1/FVC 的预测值及其下限之间的平均差异。还比较了每对方程在年龄和身高的各种组合中的预测值。

结果

在我们的研究样本中,所有研究变量的男性获得的值均明显高于 GLI 方程预测的值(p < 0.01 )。这些差异在身材矮小和年龄较大的人群中更为明显。在我们的研究样本中,女性仅 FEV1/FVC 比值的下限显著高于 GLI 方程的预测值。

结论

GLI 方程为白人成年人预测的数值明显低于巴西男性的参考值。对于男性和女性,FEV1/FVC 比值的下限均明显低于 GLI 方程的预测值。

相似文献

8

引用本文的文献

9
Reference values for spirometry in Brazilian children.巴西儿童肺量计检查的参考值。
J Bras Pneumol. 2020 Mar 27;46(3):e20190138. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20190138. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows.肺容积与用力通气流量
Eur Respir J. 1993 Mar;6 Suppl 16:5-40. doi: 10.1183/09041950.005s1693.
3
What are the causes of global differences in lung function?全球肺功能差异的原因有哪些?
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Oct;1(8):586-587. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70176-0. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
8
Lung function reference values in different German populations.不同德国人群的肺功能参考值。
Respir Med. 2011 Mar;105(3):352-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验