Mues Katherine E, Deming Michael, Kleinbaum David G, Budge Philip J, Klein Mitch, Leon Juan S, Prakash Aishya, Rout Jonathan, Fox LeAnne M
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health and Laney Graduate School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Parasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Sep 11;8(9):e3140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003140. eCollection 2014 Sep.
Lymphedema management programs have been shown to decrease episodes of adenolymphangitis (ADLA), but the impact on lymphedema progression and of program compliance have not been thoroughly explored. Our objectives were to determine the rate of ADLA episodes and lymphedema progression over time for patients enrolled in a community-based lymphedema management program. We explored the association between program compliance and ADLA episodes as well as lymphedema progression.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A lymphedema management program was implemented in Odisha State, India from 2007-2010 by the non-governmental organization, Church's Auxiliary for Social Action, in consultation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A cohort of patients was followed over 24 months. The crude 30-day rate of ADLA episodes decreased from 0.35 episodes per person-month at baseline to 0.23 at 24 months. Over the study period, the percentage of patients who progressed to more severe lymphedema decreased (P-value = 0.0004), while those whose lymphedema regressed increased over time (P-value<0.0001). Overall compliance to lymphedema management, lagged one time point, appeared to have little to no association with the frequency of ADLA episodes among those without entry lesions (RR = 0.87 (0.69, 1.10)) and was associated with an increased rate (RR = 1.44 (1.11, 1.86)) among those with entry lesions. Lagging compliance two time points, it was associated with a decrease in the rate of ADLA episodes among those with entry lesions (RR = 0.77 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.99)) and was somewhat associated among those without entry lesions (RR = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.06)). Compliance to soap was associated with a decreased rate of ADLA episodes among those without inter-digital entry lesions.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that a community-based lymphedema management program is beneficial for lymphedema patients for both ADLA episodes and lymphedema. It is one of the first studies to demonstrate an association between program compliance and rate of ADLA episodes.
淋巴水肿管理项目已被证明可减少腺淋巴管炎(ADLA)的发作次数,但对淋巴水肿进展和项目依从性的影响尚未得到充分探讨。我们的目标是确定参加社区淋巴水肿管理项目的患者ADLA发作率和淋巴水肿随时间的进展情况。我们探讨了项目依从性与ADLA发作次数以及淋巴水肿进展之间的关联。
方法/主要发现:2007年至2010年,非政府组织教会社会行动辅助会与疾病控制和预防中心协商,在印度奥里萨邦实施了一项淋巴水肿管理项目。对一组患者进行了24个月的随访。ADLA发作的粗30天率从基线时的每人每月0.35次降至24个月时的0.23次。在研究期间,进展为更严重淋巴水肿的患者百分比下降(P值 = 0.0004),而淋巴水肿消退的患者百分比随时间增加(P值<0.0001)。总体而言,淋巴水肿管理的依从性滞后一个时间点,在没有入口病变的患者中,与ADLA发作频率似乎几乎没有关联(相对风险 = 0.87(0.69,1.10)),而在有入口病变的患者中,与发作率增加相关(相对风险 = 1.44(1.11,1.86))。依从性滞后两个时间点,在有入口病变的患者中与ADLA发作率降低相关(相对风险 = 0.77(95%置信区间:0.59,0.99)),在没有入口病变的患者中也有一定关联(相对风险 = 0.83(95%置信区间:0.64,1.06))。使用肥皂的依从性与没有指叉间入口病变的患者中ADLA发作率降低相关。
结论/意义:这些结果表明,基于社区的淋巴水肿管理项目对淋巴水肿患者在ADLA发作和淋巴水肿方面均有益。这是首批证明项目依从性与ADLA发作率之间存在关联的研究之一。