Ignatowicz Agnieszka, Greenfield Geva, Pappas Yannis, Car Josip, Majeed Azeem, Harris Matthew
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2014 Dec;24(12):1711-20. doi: 10.1177/1049732314549024. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
The literature on integrated care is limited with respect to practical learning and experience. Although some attention has been paid to organizational processes and structures, not enough is paid to people, relationships, and the importance of these in bringing about integration. Little is known, for example, about provider engagement in the organizational change process, how to obtain and maintain it, and how it is demonstrated in the delivery of integrated care. Based on qualitative data from the evaluation of a large-scale integrated care initiative in London, United Kingdom, we explored the role of provider engagement in effective integration of services. Using thematic analysis, we identified an evolving engagement narrative with three distinct phases: enthusiasm, antipathy, and ambivalence, and argue that health care managers need to be aware of the impact of professional engagement to succeed in advancing the integrated care agenda.
关于综合护理的文献在实践学习和经验方面有限。尽管已经对组织流程和结构给予了一些关注,但对人员、关系以及这些在实现整合中的重要性关注不足。例如,对于提供者在组织变革过程中的参与情况、如何获得并维持这种参与,以及它在综合护理提供中的表现,人们了解甚少。基于对英国伦敦一项大规模综合护理倡议评估的定性数据,我们探讨了提供者参与在有效整合服务中的作用。通过主题分析,我们确定了一个具有三个不同阶段的不断演变的参与叙事:热情、反感和矛盾心理,并认为医疗保健管理者需要意识到专业参与对推进综合护理议程取得成功的影响。